Controversial General Political Discussion

[AL sama]

Yes, you own a freaking BUILDING.

I m struggling to eat yet I m rich??

 

[Toby D. Dog]

answer this

That's the exception not the rule. I don't think you'd be poor if you OWN a whole apartment complex in the first place. Poor people don't usually own anything. That's what being poor means.

 

[Zenos7]

I'm liking that the topic changes frequently at least

so what about this LGBTQ shit huh?
[automerge]1694033153[/automerge]

?

i take that as a yes

 

[AL sama]

If you own a whole apartment complex then I think it's fair to assume you're probably a POS. If you have two or three properties that you are renting out I don't really see a problem with that. But if your whole shtick is being a landlord then you're definitely profiting off of people's basic needs.

nah don't assume just answer

 

[Logiko]

if you have the memory of a fruit fly, go back and reread the convo

La flemme
(and take that as a No, I'm just pass this discussion with you)

silly you, thats not possible, if you own a building that automatically means you cant struggle to feed your family. fuck nuance, fuck logic, the world is black and white.

The energy spent here to defend building owners here is simply hearthwarming.

I m struggling to eat yet I m rich??

Give me example of people struggling to eat while owning a building please, I'm very curious.

 

[Zenos7]

That's the exception not the rule

doesnt really matter. he made an absolute statement about people owning buildings never struggling to provide for their family, which clearly is BS because of these exceptions. I.e. the nuance that he claims doesnt exist with this.

but well, we now found out he just didnt know what a building was

 

[Toby D. Dog]

nah don't assume just answer

I just answered.

 

[Zenos7]

(I'm just pass this discussion with you)

you always were lmfao
[automerge]1694033293[/automerge]

The energy spent here to defend building owners here is simply hearthwarming.

still strawmanning huh.

 

[Logiko]

still strawmanning huh.

You don't know what strawmanning means, don't you ?

 

[Toby D. Dog]

doesnt really matter. he made an absolute statement about people owning buildings never struggling to provide for their family, which clearly is BS because of these exceptions. I.e. the nuance that he claims doesnt exist with this.

but well, we now found out he just didnt know what a building was

Ok. So you have 1% of landlords that own big complexes going through a tough financial situation while 99% of them raise their tenants rents cause there will be no consequences if they do so. I understand you guys don't like C4N and that he usually just bulldozes instead of having an actual convo, but my point still stands.

 

[Zenos7]

Give me example of people struggling to eat while owning a building please, I'm very curious.

people who once had a nice paying job -> got a house -> then lose the job -> dont find new jobs -> struggle to eat -> maybe lose your house.

this is fairly simple and i explained this like pages ago. if only you would read what people are saying instead of just reading what you want into their comments.
[automerge]1694033494[/automerge]

You don't know what strawmanning means, don't you ?

i mean you failed to name the fallacy when you claimed i committed one, so i dont think you know.

you didnt know what terrorism or building means either.

strawman is essentially when you distort your opponents arguments and then argue your distortion of it instead of what was actually said.

you were doing alot of this lmao

 

[AL sama]

That's the exception not the rule. I don't think you'd be poor if you OWN a whole apartment complex in the first place. Poor people don't usually own anything. That's what being poor means.

what if I said that my real life situation is very close to what I just stated??

 

[Zenos7]

Ok. So you have 1% of landlords that own big complexes going through a tough financial situation while 99% of them raise their tenants rents cause there will be no consequences if they do so. I understand you guys don't like C4N and that he usually just bulldozes instead of having an actual convo, but my point still stands.

i dont dislike the dude. what he said is just objectively wrong and i called it out.

people owning buildings =/= landlords.

at least if you go by the actual definition of building and not what he said lmao

 

[AL sama]

Give me example of people struggling to eat while owning a building please, I'm very curious.

how about me??

not enough??

oh hold on I m not real??

 

[Logiko]

people who once had a nice paying job -> got a house -> then lose the job -> dont find new jobs -> struggle to eat -> maybe lose your house.

I think we are not understanding each other. By building I'm not talking about a house, i'm talking about a BUILDING. Meaning a huge building with multiple flat and studios. Of course people can be struggling with a house.

you didnt know what terrorism or building means either.

I just proved you that your notion of terrorism was inedequat and that you are casually avoiding to speak about real building. So.. yeah.. hm.

strawman is essentially when you distort your opponents arguments and then argue your distortion of it instead of what was actually said.

Yeah, and I was not aiming at your arguement, I was aiming at you. And making a conclusion on your energy spent on defending building owners.
[automerge]1694033875[/automerge]

at least if you go by the actual definition of building

You know very well that when someone say "you own a building" we don't mean a house. So stop with the intellectual lazyness please.

 

[Zenos7]

BUILDING.

Go look at the definition i posted.

Is this going to be a thing? Me needing to post definitions for you?

 

[Logiko]

how about me??

not enough??

oh hold on I m not real??

You own what type of building ? If that's a house, that's not what we are talking about here.

 

[Zenos7]

proved you that your notion of terrorism was inedequat and that you are casually avoiding to speak about real building. So.. yeah.. hm

Uhm no. The actual definitions for these terms are relevant. Go back and read them

 

[Mr. Reloaded]

so what about this LGBTQ shit huh?

 

[Logiko]

@Toby D. Dog be honest, when I say "people who own buildings", you don't understand "people who own houses" right ?