Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Basically she explains that the way the majority of Open world and fantasy world we know today are created under the prism of a colonialist ideology and basically aimed to satisfy the needs and fantasies of white people and dehumanize everyone else. It's very interesting.
I'm taking about the action of parasiting, not the nature of being a parasite. Try to catch up.
Not a parasite in itself. An entity that can (if not welcomed) parazitize the ressources of a woman's body. And in this sence, since there is no consciousness and no pain, there is absolutely no reason not to get rid of it if there is no consent.
It's simple : It's women's body it's THEIR choice to make.
Not yours.
I'm taking about the action of parasiting, not the nature of being a parasite. Try to catch up.
Not a parasite in itself. An entity that can (if not welcomed) parazitize the ressources of a woman's body. And in this sence, since there is no consciousness and no pain, there is absolutely no reason not to get rid of it if there is no consent.
It's simple : It's women's body it's THEIR choice to make.
Not yours.
No. You are confusing an action and a function.
A parasite will FUNCTION through parasiting, it's the only way it can survive.
A baby is not a parasiting anything if the mother is willingly giving them ressources. On the other hand, they will do the ACTION of paraziting if there is no consent.
Again : Function =/= Action.
In this context. Abortion is legitimate.
A parasite will FUNCTION through parasiting, it's the only way it can survive.
A baby is not a parasiting anything if the mother is willingly giving them ressources. On the other hand, they will do the ACTION of paraziting if there is no consent.
Again : Function =/= Action.
In this context. Abortion is legitimate.
No.I'm simply explaning what happens in reality, something you refuse to aknowledge.
Indeed, a foetus is not a parasite, it's not its nature or its survival function BUT - when UNWANTED (and stop clearly on this notion) - he ACTS by parasiting the body's space and ressources WITHOUT CONSENT.
Action =/= Function
Indeed, a foetus is not a parasite, it's not its nature or its survival function BUT - when UNWANTED (and stop clearly on this notion) - he ACTS by parasiting the body's space and ressources WITHOUT CONSENT.
Action =/= Function
The one acting without selfish moral here is you.
You are priviledging the HYPOTHESIS of a human being (A foetus that doesn't feel and doesn't think) OVER the real life and choices of a woman.
The one who is a problem is not me here.
What you don't understand is that the act of parasitizing comes socially with the notion of the lack of consent when we are talking about the action.
So yes. When unwanted, the foetus acts (from the point of view of the bearer) as a parazite. It's LITERALY what it is from their point of you.
But I get that you don't care about that since you take the point of view of women into account in this situation.
You are priviledging the HYPOTHESIS of a human being (A foetus that doesn't feel and doesn't think) OVER the real life and choices of a woman.
The one who is a problem is not me here.
What you don't understand is that the act of parasitizing comes socially with the notion of the lack of consent when we are talking about the action.
So yes. When unwanted, the foetus acts (from the point of view of the bearer) as a parazite. It's LITERALY what it is from their point of you.
But I get that you don't care about that since you take the point of view of women into account in this situation.