Again, that didn't happen 100 years ago. Korea and Manchuria are not filled with ethnic japanese.

If that was the case then yes, China and Korea would be unreasonable for wanting that land back.
I was obviously talking about a hypothetical scenario smh

If Japan won the world war and they began to mass emigrate their civilians while letting the locals to have only a portion of their land. Do you think they would have agreed or they would have continued their resistance?


Again, what the fuck does this have to do with anything? I want Palestinians to have their own land and autonomy. Obviously I would be against Israel occupying the land and putting them in concentration camps.

Seriously take you meds, you're seeing things and shadowboxing.
I said this earlier, Taiwan and Ukraine already had their independence and thus is too late to return to their previous state. Same thing cannot be said for the palestinians.

CCP taking Taiwan or Russia taking Ukraine is obviously not equivalent to the oppressed Palestinian wanting their land back.

You are the one that should take meds, conveniently forgot something i just said a while ago


Nah you're incoherent af. You said wars aren't necessary, then right after claim that wars will happen. Moron
Again putting words into my mouth. I said wars arent necessary, but i will not have my expectation high that the israeli will pursue the peaceful path. You're an entire circus
 
I was obviously talking about a hypothetical scenario smh

If Japan won the world war and they began to mass emigrate their civilians while letting the locals to have only a portion of their land. Do you think they would have agreed or they would have continued their resistance?
s
But this hypothetical has nothing to do with the original argument. This is why I said it wasn't relevant.

We are talking about now, not 1967
 

These types of practices, landlords choosing to rent only to jewish tenants and kicking out palestinian ones simply because they are palestinian, is illegal in the USA and I'm pretty sure it is illegal in most western countries. It is called housing discrimination.

Yet America seems perfectly fine when Israel engages in this behavior. And the thing is, this isn't a modern phenomenon. The Zionist movement has been doing this since pre-statehood. One of the ways the zionist movement tried to gain ground was by buying land from absentee landlords and then kicking out the palestinian tenants. All for the goal of securing a land for a jewish majority state.
 

These types of practices, landlords choosing to rent only to jewish tenants and kicking out palestinian ones simply because they are palestinian, is illegal in the USA and I'm pretty sure it is illegal in most western countries. It is called housing discrimination.

Yet America seems perfectly fine when Israel engages in this behavior. And the thing is, this isn't a modern phenomenon. The Zionist movement has been doing this since pre-statehood. One of the ways the zionist movement tried to gain ground was by buying land from absentee landlords and then kicking out the palestinian tenants. All for the goal of securing a land for a jewish majority state.
Biden is preparing to do something about the settlers,

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/...iolent-israeli-settlers-in-west-bank-00127940
 
You the other day had no idea why Sudan was constantly involved in wars, guess what? What you want is literally a Sudan 2.0 in the Levant.
We already have that

I think Jews and Arabs can peacefully coexist alongside each other without the need for an exclusively Jewish or exclusively Arab state.

The only way such a dream can be made into reality is if enough people believe in it, so I choose to believe in it.
 
No we don't

What's going in occupied Palestinian land is bad, what Sudan has gone through the past 20 years is downright horrible.

The Darfur genocide is estimated to have over 400,000 casualties.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darfur_genocide


I think Jews and Arabs can peacefully coexist alongside each other without the need for an exclusively Jewish or exclusively Arab state.

The only way such a dream can be made into reality is if enough people believe in it, so I choose to believe in it.
That is naive, and I thank any god out there the people in charge are not as naive as you.

Palestinians and Israelis don't want to be under 1 government, lets keep it that way. Kick the Israelis off the West Bank and Gaza and give the Palestinians control of their land. If the two nations want to combine under 1 that should be on both their terms. What you're preaching is low key colonizer mindset, forcing ethnic groups together.
 
uhm the last paragraph was actually this short one


How the Supreme Court's decision for gay marriage could affect religious institutions | Pew Research Center

that you actually left out and i added it here lmao. cant make this shit up.
[automerge]1700402553[/automerge]

however you want to do that "peacefully".
The funny is that i actually missed that small last paragraph lol:nicagesmile:
Anyway,that article was just to exemplify that legalizing gay marriage is not straight forward and there are possible judicial consequences to religious freedom.
 
We already have that

I think Jews and Arabs can peacefully coexist alongside each other without the need for an exclusively Jewish or exclusively Arab state.

The only way such a dream can be made into reality is if enough people believe in it, so I choose to believe in it.
Oh my bunny:lawsigh: @Loo is actually getting a rare W here.
Just take a look at African country borders and then think again.....
 
But this hypothetical has nothing to do with the original argument. This is why I said it wasn't relevant.

We are talking about now, not 1967
It has to do with keeping a single standard

It was also rather a rhetorical question. Why would the korean and chinese be lenient if japanese started to migrate as it means more japanese illegally occupying their land. Implying they would have stopped their resistance is a no brainer

If Israeli starts to move out of Palestine but the military establishments, nothing will change.
 
It has to do with keeping a single standard
Except what ever standard you're trying to set doesn't track with the hypothetical set.

Again, hypothetical is if Israel left the occupied land( West Bank & Gaza) would it be justified for Palestinians to want the entirety of Israel? You said yes. What ever hypothetical you bring, if you want to make a comparison has to be similar to the hypothetical set.


It was also rather a rhetorical question. Why would the korean and chinese be lenient if japanese started to migrate as it means more japanese illegally occupying their land. Implying they would have stopped their resistance is a no brainer
Again, back to the hypothetical

if Israel left the occupied land( West Bank & Gaza) would it be justified for Palestinians to want the entirety of Israel?
Your rhetorical question just doesn't apply here. Like I've said, in the 1950s/60s? yeah sure. Now? No. There's millions of ethnic Israelis in the land.

Like I've said before. The correct question is "If Imperial Japan after annexing Korea and Manchuria decided to move millions of ethnic Japanese people and present day are the super majority of the land, would it be justify for koreans or chinese people to try to reclaim that land in 2023?"

And I've already said no, that is ridiculous.

If Israeli starts to move out of Palestine but the military establishments, nothing will change.
Obviously the hope is each side stays on their own side
 
Except what ever standard you're trying to set doesn't track with the hypothetical set.

Again, hypothetical is if Israel left the occupied land( West Bank & Gaza) would it be justified for Palestinians to want the entirety of Israel? You said yes. What ever hypothetical you bring, if you want to make a comparison has to be similar to the hypothetical set.




Again, back to the hypothetical



Your rhetorical question just doesn't apply here. Like I've said, in the 1950s/60s? yeah sure. Now? No. There's millions of ethnic Israelis in the land.

Like I've said before. The correct question is "If Imperial Japan after annexing Korea and Manchuria decided to move millions of ethnic Japanese people and present day are the super majority of the land, would it be justify for koreans or chinese people to try to reclaim that land in 2023?"

And I've already said no, that is ridiculous.


Obviously the hope is each side stays on their own side
My bunny you're still going at it?
 
Top