In that fascism is anti capitalist, but only in a limited sense.
Fascism is in between. As fascism maintains some elements of capitalism while opposing others. Whereas socialism and communism want to abolish capitalism altogether.
Absolutely and utterly :
NO
Fascism is PURELY capitalist. And historically placed at the far right of the political spectrum.
Fascism is literally what Capitalism can do when there is no barrier (libertarianism) and when they are reactionnary values added to the mix.
For exemple, Eugenism, is an extention of ableism that also exist and is pushed by fascism.
Fascism is a perfect product of capitalism.
Fascism is in a very technical way Centrism yes
Centrist like Merkel and Third Wayers get very insecure when it's pointed out that their rhetorics is similar to Early Fascists
No, it's far right. The reason why centrists are pointed out, is because the current rightistist in Europe (Merkel, Macron) are leaning far right. There is nothing "centrist" about Fascism.
But historically, it is a fact that fascism was allowed to pass because of the bourgeoisie. Simply because fascism has the same interest.
I want everyone to be more well off. Your Conflating Maga to be one with all Millionaires/Billionaires.
I don't see any bitching about the Leftist Billionaries/Millionaries. *Bernie as well.
There can't be a billionnaire leftist. Millionnaire yes as it's much more easy to do.
Maybe we should ALL look for the difference between 1 million and 1 billion (don't worry, we don't have to watch all the video):
This is ridiculously insane. Not even Sanji was ever this kind of simp
If you can't believe a woman that tells you that she was raped, then trust me.
I'm not the problem.
This is sick. You are the worst and dumbest kind of dictator.
Saying this while completely ignoring a scenario where the option of not needing proof to judge is wild. But since you are using bad faith, here is a clearer exemple for you:
If a man kills another man in front of you. You don't have to wait for the delivering of a justice tribunal to call the man a murderer.
This is what not needing justice to judge means.
AKA I know better than you because I'm a leftist. By the way, you are the person who are not aware that muslims literally want to take over the world.
I will ignore this for your sake.
This is another proof how you don't understand science and humans as well. This sentence has nothing to do with science. You can be fan of whatever you want and believe in whatever utopia you want. What you are fan of, what utopia you crave for, has nothing to do with science.
Your world has nothing to do with science mate, I'm very sorry. I'm trying to be respectfull but don't push the buttons here.
Learn about science, leanr about SOCIAL science too and then you will come back to me to try to lecture me about science.
You are totally againt science. For you we'd be living in stone age or even before that just to prevent any kind of job to go instinct. You literally said people from ancient times lived better than us while fighting for their lives to get their food everyday, running from predators, not being able to treat from simple diseases that we don't even bother nowadays, and not being aware of poisonous living beings, gases etc.
Never said "lived better". I said that there are things that were better, like for example, the distributions of tasks.
You are confusing everything I say while purpusely ignoring 50% of the actual content.. which is really starting to bug me off at the moment since I'm doing major effort to be nice.
I already replied. I won't reply again if you don't accepted my answer because it won't change.
You have low to zero understanding of how the world works. And I'm being polite to not say your understanding is actually negative.
I never said about unlimited resources.
I checked TWICE everything.
No you didn't. You ignored the entire paragraph
Here it is again :
I will not talk about all the magic thinking about technology you are displaying to solve all your problems in your system, I wanna concentrate on the real stuff: You are talking about the fact that I lack nuance. Why not. And to explain that you are invoking the fact that the world is is not only about being rich, it's about wealth, knowledge, informations or even luck.
This is good, because you are talking here about something scientifics call "capitals", without entering in the detail right now (it's will be for another discussion I think) Capitals are composed of different factors that are economic, social and cultural. And you are right in the sense that those capitals are what push us toward wealth and health and overall a potential happyness
Now, here comes my interrogation:
No matter how lucky or knowledgeable you are in your world, one's financial wealth will ALWAYS get first access to ressources and technologies, and will always remain the main potential gatekeeper. As long as someone can block access to key resources, you cannot compete with an absolute monopoly, no matter if it’s a city block wide or the size of an entire galaxy !
All the luck or knowledge in the world doesn’t change that. Your system is still black and white: there are those who get there first, and everyone else.
As such... If financial wealth always allow the controls and access of key ressources and key assets & can allow people to create infinite needs and robotic or human exploitation, how do you prevent someone from monopolizing everything and thus perpetuating a cycle of inequalities ?
