you do realize slavery was abolished the 1860s, not 1960s
I know slavery was abolished in America in the 19th century from when I heard about and looked into the story of John Brown, but I'm not american, however I was more so giving an example of what he said about black people and civil rights
 
racist or sexist are slurs either but people still feel insult by those words

that's my point
No argument here
It is illegal to call someone a nazi or fascist without actual proof where I live. It's called defamation. You don't even know if you are speaking to someone that would fit the racial profile of a nazi. It's a stupid slur used to dehumanize people. This is what got Charlie Kirk killed. Defamation, dehumanization, and incitement of violence are what you people constantly do against conservatives. Left wing people are violent hypocrites.
I still disagree that it is a slur strictly by the textbook definition of what a slur is but I understand how it can be used to defame and dehumanize an individual.
 
The far right calls everyone they disagree with a communist. Proof of polarization of the political landscape
Maybe old neocons and boomers

No, the term communist as an insult is not really common on the far right
[automerge]1757712440[/automerge]
Didn't you imply you have more radical takes than Charlie?
Anything right of moderate libertarian Charlie is a Nazi
:suresure:
 
You’re absolutely right, my friend… @NAMELESS @Ravagerblade Take a good look at the guy you’re mourning, bitter and hateful from start to finish just like you






[automerge]1757681020[/automerge]

Nah, but it’s not nearly as thorough as it should be, nor does it include a psych evaluation like we need…conservatives are so terrified that someone will take their automatic machine guns away, they’ve made it easy enough for a kid to take one to school and light up their classmates. The fact that righties can bear so many children dying from this kind of violence and STILL not do anything to protect them kinda says it all about where they stand when it comes to being productive members of society instead of soulless mongrels.
[automerge]1757681115[/automerge]

Well, just like Nameless would do, I’m not gonna let facts stand in the way of the conclusion I’ve drawn :SmugRain:
There are probably 4000 people on the server worth talking to I would assume thats why people log on.

your politics aside, communication isnt your strong suit.
fix up .
English isn't my first language. Don't really respect this language, really... Used to, not anymore.
you figured it out, leaning left politically isnt reserved for superhmans.
wdym you dont have a group of friends here?
you dont have common ground with other right wingers here?
if so thats a bigger issue
Not really looking for friends. People in here have talked to me in private outside of this forum. I'm just cautious around strangers online . Especially how things are currently in Brazil. Doxxing kills.
 
I don’t believe Kirk was pro slavery but I do believe he was a separatist. He also clearly failed to understand why things like affirmative action had to be implemented to begin with. On top of that he did also state that black people were better in terms of crime statistics in the 1940s before the civil rights movement while failing to recognize the social state of the nation at that point in time.
separatist? probably not. If I were to assume he probably believes in some Thomas Sowell shit like Black people could've been integrated differently via economic means and not government policy intervention or something
video is readily available online also the civil rights act
if you were really interested
listening to it now
 
From what I quickly gathered in 5 minutes it sounds like he's saying it led to DEI policies or some shit. Obviously I don't agree with this but that is very different than being pro slavery lol
Thats completely separate , its a law that in effect outlawed jim crowe

"The landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in employment, education, and public accommodations"
so what really are you saying.
 
separatist? probably not. If I were to assume he probably believes in some Thomas Sowell shit like Black people could've been integrated differently via economic means and not government policy intervention or something

listening to it now
That was another name he mentioned so you’re probably correct on that front
 
Thats completely separate , its a law that in effect outlawed jim crowe

"The landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in employment, education, and public accommodations"
so what really are you saying.
yeah, that's what I said. Sounds like he's making the argument that the civil right act led to DEI policies that are "anti white discrimination"

Very different than making pro slavery arguments that gave me a bit of a pause
 
Maybe old neocons and boomers

No, the term communist as an insult is not really common on the far right
[automerge]1757712440[/automerge]


Anything right of moderate libertarian Charlie is a Nazi
:suresure:
You can argue Charlie himself is one because of how extreme his beliefs are
Now imagine someone like you who implied he's worse than Charlie
Doesn't take a genius to figure this out. We're not insulting you, we're just going off your own words. It's not even an accusation, you basically confirmed you're one.
 
I'm not getting banned for shit in this thread lol
I'm not even dumb enough to lose my cool and start throwing slurs or death threats or any other rule breaking terms/phrases.
But either way, you came here looking for an argument, and you got exactly like that. If you can't handle us insulting you then don't come here
I'm handling things just fine. I'm just here to point out the hypocrisy of the people that preach for equality so much. YES, I'M HERE FOR ARGUMENTS, GENIUS. THIS PLACE WAS CREATED FOR THIS.
 
Top