They are bullshitting you. "Nazi" means exactly what you pointed out. They do that to try and make the opposite side look like monsters. Oh, btw, before telling me I'm doing the same, I will tell you in advance I have history on my side. The people that preach liberty, equality, human rights, and blah blah are also the ones with an extensive track record of violating those. Even Europe isn't truly free anymore. The left is eroding the West to a point where it is going to collapse at some point.
Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Yeah and I didn't dispute that, in fact I pointed out it was about Jim Crow Laws?
Again, the initial statement is enough to give me a pause. If for example someone said Donald Trump is pro eating babies would that not cause you to pause and ask "Wait, is he really?"
Like be more intellectually curious
and what exactly and who are you arguing against/for?
Again, the initial statement is enough to give me a pause. If for example someone said Donald Trump is pro eating babies would that not cause you to pause and ask "Wait, is he really?"
Like be more intellectually curious
and what exactly and who are you arguing against/for?
If you don't care about how modern people use it, feel free to stop censoring people for calling others Nazis, when those people support Concentration Camps and genocide in the modern era.
What semantics, AL.
Yeah, we're calling them Nazis because they support Concentration Camps and Genocide.
Also, you're aware that some of the posters here, are quoting/defending people who openly admit to being Nazis, support what the Germans did, and some who have ties to real Neo-Nazi groups?
You and @Logiko should make a dictionary together, if you're gonna nitpick over calling people who starve children to death what they call themselves.
If you care more about your own rules and definitions, than the starving children being turned into puddles of blood, there's a lot of governments that are hiring people like that, just letting you know. People who care more about the rules that people's lives.
If you weren't full of it, you'd know that words have different meanings/evolve, and that cultures often use words differently.
We call them that, because they won't stop talking about how Hitler was right. We're calling them what they align with.
Yeah, you don't censor truth... just when people call people who support Nazism, out as Nazis.
Corporate Slave Level Behavior
Lol, no, you'll censor the shit out of the truth if you think it's offensive, or it breaks your "rules" that work sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo well at making this thread non-toxic. Great rules, bro. Very legal, and VERY COOL.
You could, you know, ban the people advocating for child murder. The actual toxicity.
Authoritarian clown.
What semantics, AL.
Yeah, we're calling them Nazis because they support Concentration Camps and Genocide.
Also, you're aware that some of the posters here, are quoting/defending people who openly admit to being Nazis, support what the Germans did, and some who have ties to real Neo-Nazi groups?
You and @Logiko should make a dictionary together, if you're gonna nitpick over calling people who starve children to death what they call themselves.
If you care more about your own rules and definitions, than the starving children being turned into puddles of blood, there's a lot of governments that are hiring people like that, just letting you know. People who care more about the rules that people's lives.
If you weren't full of it, you'd know that words have different meanings/evolve, and that cultures often use words differently.
We call them that, because they won't stop talking about how Hitler was right. We're calling them what they align with.
Yeah, you don't censor truth... just when people call people who support Nazism, out as Nazis.
Corporate Slave Level Behavior
Lol, no, you'll censor the shit out of the truth if you think it's offensive, or it breaks your "rules" that work sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo well at making this thread non-toxic. Great rules, bro. Very legal, and VERY COOL.
You could, you know, ban the people advocating for child murder. The actual toxicity.
Authoritarian clown.
The moderation is completely lost in term of anti-hate speech.
They consider call-out as slurs and real hatefull rethoric (anti-trans, ableist, racist) as simple political disagreement (you can verify, the rethoric is still present on this thread and the threats of bans for call out also). It's not normal.
Kirk was a fascist. It's unquestionnable from a sociological point of view. Do not even try. I'm not laughing.
They consider call-out as slurs and real hatefull rethoric (anti-trans, ableist, racist) as simple political disagreement (you can verify, the rethoric is still present on this thread and the threats of bans for call out also). It's not normal.
Anything right of moderate libertarian Charlie is a Nazi
He isn't extreme on shit
Maybe abortion but that isn't a Nazi issue
He was
-pro legal immigration and some illegal immigration (if it helped the economy)
-pro Jew. Jew cheerleader of the decade (very Nazi of him)
-functionally pro homosexual (he did not care about its legalization and was OK with their entry into the conservative movement)
he was a moderate by all accounts. Lol
Maybe abortion but that isn't a Nazi issue
He was
-pro legal immigration and some illegal immigration (if it helped the economy)
-pro Jew. Jew cheerleader of the decade (very Nazi of him)
-functionally pro homosexual (he did not care about its legalization and was OK with their entry into the conservative movement)
he was a moderate by all accounts. Lol
You know for the longest time too I recall people on the right wing embraced MLk's message
but in recent years am seeing a lot more of distaste
I could care less about the whores anyone hired in their personal life
This thought process seems foreign because there's so much group or collective mindset now
but the fact is every individual is responsible for their own actions and their own actions alone.
That is a faultless message . Think back on what you said about him and thomas sowell @Roo I really dont think so.
so Not DEI then
its against the law which outlaws discrimination
but in recent years am seeing a lot more of distaste
I could care less about the whores anyone hired in their personal life
This thought process seems foreign because there's so much group or collective mindset now
but the fact is every individual is responsible for their own actions and their own actions alone.
That is a faultless message . Think back on what you said about him and thomas sowell @Roo I really dont think so.
Post automatically merged:
so Not DEI then
its against the law which outlaws discrimination
