Do you consider the disruption of the UK arms industry to prevent the help of the country for a genocide, to be "terror attacks"?
Correct. It has no place in the UK in the first place.
She broke into Elbit systems as part of Palestine Action's acts.
So if a group is designated as terrorist by a state, how do you make sure that this designation is ethical ?
In my case, my own discretion rather than the state's words. Attacking industries within the UK on behalf of a foreign state's agenda is terrorism, bruv.
As I showed you, yet, pro-palestine protest who tried to denounce the repression of Palestine Action were actually massively arrested.
Because that protest is literally promoting a terrorist organisation.
Do you feel as the risk relative to Anti-immigration protests (with counter manifestation, organization in sensible area, sometimes straight up fascist and racist behaviors)... is the same as with protestors trying to prevent a genocide?
Now, we disagree on what 'racism' means, as you think it is all about executable power and domination, but yes, I do.
I don't think being anti-immigration is racist, especially in the face of demographic and cultural change which the people of the country didn't even vote for.
The protesters can say they are trying to prevent genocide, but all they're doing is committing terrorism against the nation that was kind enough to give them a home in most cases. If they really want to stop a genocide, go to the country directly, don't commit domestic attacks.
I'd let the daft woman starve herself to death as a lesson to everyone else who threatens to kill themselves in order to get out of jail. Consequences.
Don't be dense, it's more of a lifestyle culture than a class one
It's the assumption that they vote in the first place. People in those communities rarely vote. The ones that do vote tend to go for left-wing governments because it gives them more handouts.