Speculations Guys, I think, Shanks might be a swordsman

#14
b-BuT hE iS a HaKimAn, a hAkI sPeCiAliSt, iT jUsT loOkS LiKe hE cUtS tHinGs B-bUt aCcCcShUaLLy HiS hAki Is sEpErAtInG tHiNgS wHithOuT rEaLlY cUtTiNG tHeM cAuSe tHaT wOuLd mEaN hE iS a SwOrDsMan wHiCh hE iSn't


Meanwhile Shanks the swordsman swordsmanning around for decades by now
 
#15
b-BuT hE iS a HaKimAn, a hAkI sPeCiAliSt, iT jUsT loOkS LiKe hE cUtS tHinGs B-bUt aCcCcShUaLLy HiS hAki Is sEpErAtInG tHiNgS wHithOuT rEaLlY cUtTiNG tHeM cAuSe tHaT wOuLd mEaN hE iS a SwOrDsMan wHiCh hE iSn't


Meanwhile Shanks the swordsman swordsmanning around for decades by now
 
#16
There is no need of an argument. If Oda wants, he can prove Shanks isnt a swordsman the same way he did with King.

That said, why does it matter? If its about Mihawk, it doesnt change anything. Oda constantly compares them to the point he brought up Shanks even while revealing Mihawk's bounty. They will be more or less equal.
 
Top