[FNZ] Super Role Madness Hunter x Hunter Game
- Thread starter Fujishiro
- Start date
- Tags capybara town conejo yujiro says hello fuji 2nd greatest host of wg fuji is a bum indie hunters must burn in the stake indies are the superior alignment indies must burn indies on wg are guaranteed to win indies will bring salvation to mafia lynch flowa mooncrash in 3 cycles muu-sama pineapple pizza > pepperoni pizza playing indie requires no skill prof is always gf or indie on fuji games prof onlyfans bathwater scum puppet town x mafia ultra where's pizza?
- Status
after all this i still think u guys r likely more town than not, and shud be self resolving - this is where i was last day and night 1
but i understand if ppl sus u
however i dont intend to yeet u today, or in the near future baring town flips in ur PoE / or some mech if yall stay alive for too long - basically standard procedure regarding self resolving slots that do not hit scum for too long
hopefully this post clarifies where am at in terms of u 2 rn
nothing else to add from me
but i understand if ppl sus u
however i dont intend to yeet u today, or in the near future baring town flips in ur PoE / or some mech if yall stay alive for too long - basically standard procedure regarding self resolving slots that do not hit scum for too long
hopefully this post clarifies where am at in terms of u 2 rn
nothing else to add from me
I have no reason to accept this as an explanation. From my perspective, you tried to employ a bait and switch and were not able to execute it.
Neither of these quotes address the questions that I outlined
1 - why do you have us as town, if you think we're liars? Just going based off of your actions this game, if you believe that suspicion is agreeable then when you have us in a lie, it should be fairly reconcilable for you that we're not town. You have demonstrated no reasoning as to why you hold this position. You also implied that you were responsible for my actions not appearing in the Night writeup, which means you couldn't have townread me Night 1. So what part of Day 2 changed your mind?
You also don't explain why this is where your focus lies - to the absence of everything else.
Neither of these quotes address the questions that I outlined
1 - why do you have us as town, if you think we're liars? Just going based off of your actions this game, if you believe that suspicion is agreeable then when you have us in a lie, it should be fairly reconcilable for you that we're not town. You have demonstrated no reasoning as to why you hold this position. You also implied that you were responsible for my actions not appearing in the Night writeup, which means you couldn't have townread me Night 1. So what part of Day 2 changed your mind?
You also don't explain why this is where your focus lies - to the absence of everything else.
no no they r different, its mutually inclusive
u lied to hide that prof can tank a kill, among other reasons
i cant understand how the lie makes him tank more kills, the other reasons i dont recall yall saying what they r
can u tell me why did yall lie again if not solely for him to tank a kill actually
u lied to hide that prof can tank a kill, among other reasons
i cant understand how the lie makes him tank more kills, the other reasons i dont recall yall saying what they r
can u tell me why did yall lie again if not solely for him to tank a kill actually
Why would it - you offer no supporting g evidence or real clarification. Instead, you just repeat the same empty sentiments that do not logically line up with what you've chosen to argue and invest your time in. You're the leading wagon and apparently instead of finding scum, you want me to believe that your thread time is spent arguing why you're town reads might be scum. It shouldn't really be a surprise to you that it leaves me questioning your motivations, especially when you seem to be incapable of providing a coherent answer.
because prof was solving the game day 1, i have him more town than u r
and i dont think the lie u r caught in auto makes u scum because its such an obvious lie to prove, like it didnt take much skill or hunting to find it out, so its not going to be a lie that u 2 will bank on making use of to hide that u r scum
and no i had yall lean town / self resolving day 1 and n1
and i dont think the lie u r caught in auto makes u scum because its such an obvious lie to prove, like it didnt take much skill or hunting to find it out, so its not going to be a lie that u 2 will bank on making use of to hide that u r scum
and no i had yall lean town / self resolving day 1 and n1
Well I'm not, because you have consistently failed to adequately respond to what I'm saying. The only assumption I've made is that you're capable of considering wider play, and running some simple risk analysis regarding gambits performed. If you take any exception to me making those assumptions, then sure, but otherwise you're inventing what it is I'm actually taking issue with from your play.
the only reason u said initially (one of u said it) was about tanking a kill for ratchet, which isnt logically sufficient reason - hence why i had doubts about it
if there is another reason that makes more sense, but i cant find out any general reason for this. has to be something role specific to prof
also spare me the fishing commentary, u were an outed non town, i'll ask u till im satisfied. know ur place indie
if there is another reason that makes more sense, but i cant find out any general reason for this. has to be something role specific to prof
also spare me the fishing commentary, u were an outed non town, i'll ask u till im satisfied. know ur place indie
Firstly, why do you feel like I haven't been attempting to solve the game? You're going to have to demonstrate that you've factored in my play here - otherwise this is either a completely unfair assessment of my play (would mean you're scum, or it's your usual vendetta - you can pick). If that's the case, I have no reason to extend the charity to your position that you want me to.
Moreover, this has absolutely nothing to do with what I'm questioning. What part of that post asked which of us, between Prof and I, do you townread more?
As an aside, let me ask you - why do you think I bother to engage with you, if it's not to solve the game? I feel like, as a person, you often try to troll me because you don't like me, on a personal level, which in turn means I find you to be, generally, a very unpleasant person to interact with. Literally every interaction we have, you attempt to insult me or generate an emotional response from me. I don't know why - I once considered you a friend outside of these games. My point is, why do you claim that I'm not trying to game solve, when I'm actively engaging with someone I do not like engaging with, to solve their slot?
What lie am I caught in?
Then you're going to have to explain why you targeted me Night 1, with a conditional ability that would be affected by my alignment.
Moreover, this has absolutely nothing to do with what I'm questioning. What part of that post asked which of us, between Prof and I, do you townread more?
As an aside, let me ask you - why do you think I bother to engage with you, if it's not to solve the game? I feel like, as a person, you often try to troll me because you don't like me, on a personal level, which in turn means I find you to be, generally, a very unpleasant person to interact with. Literally every interaction we have, you attempt to insult me or generate an emotional response from me. I don't know why - I once considered you a friend outside of these games. My point is, why do you claim that I'm not trying to game solve, when I'm actively engaging with someone I do not like engaging with, to solve their slot?
What lie am I caught in?
Then you're going to have to explain why you targeted me Night 1, with a conditional ability that would be affected by my alignment.
- Status