[FNZ] Super Role Madness Hunter x Hunter Game

[Indigo]

What specific contention do you have? @Naomi You can answer this too but I suspect I won't like it much.

there's just way too much possible things that shit could be fake

a simply fake wu and now a double teamup play

maybe indie and scum helping each other

 

[Mr. Reloaded]

Dr Prof killed himself?? Why?

Why not?

 

[oddoddfruit]

Dr Prof killed himself?? Why?

memes 100%

 

[Naomi]

What specific contention do you have? @Naomi You can answer this too but I suspect I won't like it much.

blame prof he painted you image as scummy and sus

 

[Mr. Reloaded]

Poor Cake is probably so confused rn

 

[CakeWalker]

Flower keeps town locking Naomi, and this reminds me a lot of them town locking Dr. Watson. This would a great way to mirror behaviour as town in a past game, but this might be NAI

 

[Ratchet]

there's just way too much possible things that shit could be fake

a simply fake wu and now a double teamup play

maybe indie and scum helping each other

I mean of course it could be, but you're not likely to read either of us correctly if you're basing your reasoning off of what is possible in an SRM of all things. What about our play?

 

[Ratchet]

Flower keeps town locking Naomi, and this reminds me a lot of them town locking Dr. Watson. This would a great way to mirror behaviour as town in a past game, but this might be NAI

Shade - you're undermining a town read on the basis of another game, without establishing that the two scenarios deserve to be equated. Bad.

 

[Red Night]

@Flower what did you do?

 

[Ratchet]

blame prof he painted you image as scummy and sus

How did he do this? It's *your* read, I'll "blame" *you*. Again I'll echo what I said to Indigo, what specific issue do you have with my play thus far to warrant this mistrust?

 

[Emil]

all 3 indies already outed, boring

anyway yeet one of odd/blue then yeet the other next day if they dont die at night, it's a no brainer

 

[CakeWalker]

Shade - you're undermining a town read on the basis of another game, without establishing that the two scenarios deserve to be equated. Bad.

Not a potential meta read, but not attaching a certain scum read is bad? Okay. LOL

 

[Ratchet]

all 3 indies already outed, boring

anyway yeet one of odd/blue then yeet the other next day if they dont die at night, it's a no brainer

Bad bad bad.

 

[Ratchet]

Not a potential meta read, but not attaching a certain scum read is bad? Okay. LOL

I'm not following what your point is here.

 

[Emil]

Bad bad bad.

dont care
i've done my job, yall slacking on the scum end of things

 

[CakeWalker]

Not a meta read that isn't NAI, is just an observation. How can it be bad? Its a neutral comment

 

[Naomi]

How did he do this? It's *your* read, I'll "blame" *you*. Again I'll echo what I said to Indigo, what specific issue do you have with my play thus far to warrant this mistrust?

mafia game no one is confirmed, but will ignore for now.

town pile you go from prof claim then.

 

[Indigo]

I mean of course it could be, but you're not likely to read either of us correctly if you're basing your reasoning off of what is possible in an SRM of all things. What about our play?

Prof seems to be just shit posting so far, seems really relaxed, not a care in the world

Not sure about you

 

[Ratchet]

Not a meta read that isn't NAI, is just an observation. How can it be bad? Its a neutral comment

I explained the issue - you were equating Flower reading Naomi as town here with Flower misreading Watson from last game - this undermines the read on Naomi by establishing that Flower can be this confident and wrong. But there is no reason for you to make this equivalence, hence why it's bad. Again it's in the post.

 

[Ultra]

Ratchet trying to save the indies so they can cuck us all game. Sad!