Powers & Abilities If there is a Human human devil fruit, then there should be a god god (nika) devil fruit

#1
If there is a Human human devil fruit, then there should be a god god devil fruit
- The Hito Hito no Mi is a Zoan-type Devil Fruit that allows its user to transform into a human hybrid or a human at will. This is the devil fruit presently used by Tony Tony Chopper of the strawhat pirates.
- Luffy's devil fruit is the god god - zoan type devil fruit that allows him to transform into a god hybrid or a god at will.
 
#3
Isn't Budda Buddha devil fruit (Sengoku's df) close to it? Buddha is God in Chinese culture.
Yes, I think thats true. The Hito Hito no Mi, Model: Daibutsu It is a (Mythical) Zoan-type Devil Fruit Plus, in one piece there are always devil fruits with similar abilities, (e.g the invisibility DF, camouflage DF, Science invisibility )
So imagine how many other Mythical zoan-type devil fruits exist?
 
#8
This reasoning makes zero sense; in no way the existence of a Human Human model in a family made of animals implies there's a "god" fruit, whatever that means (what kind of god?).

Also, you forgot the Hito Hito, model: Onyudo.
This reasoning makes zero sense; in no way the existence of a Human Human model in a family made of animals implies there's a "god" fruit, whatever that means (what kind of god?).

Also, you forgot the Hito Hito, model: Onyudo.
Hito Hito no Mi, Model: Daibutsu It is a (Mythical) Zoan-type Devil Fruit (is budha considered as god?) Sengokhu's devil fruit
 
#10
Hito Hito no Mi, Model: Daibutsu It is a (Mythical) Zoan-type Devil Fruit (is budha considered as god?) Sengokhu's devil fruit
...So? That doesn't support that a "god" fruit must exist since we have Chopper's ability; there are tons of mythical humanoids that aren't gods and would fit. Even in Sengoku's case, Oda made sure he didn't have the literal Budha power but its representation, hence why Sengoku's ability isn't godly per se. Something like "Hito Hito no mi, model: god" is absurd and completely empty as a concept.
 
#12
...So? That doesn't support that a "god" fruit must exist since we have Chopper's ability; there are tons of mythical humanoids that aren't gods and would fit. Even in Sengoku's case, Oda made sure he didn't have the literal Budha power but its representation, hence why Sengoku's ability isn't godly per se. Something like "Hito Hito no mi, model: god" is absurd and completely empty as a concept.
it will translate into god (not necessarily called god) or could be god in another religion. it will be a mythical zoan fruit with name that translates to god or similar
 
#14
...So? That doesn't support that a "god" fruit must exist since we have Chopper's ability; there are tons of mythical humanoids that aren't gods and would fit. Even in Sengoku's case, Oda made sure he didn't have the literal Budha power but its representation, hence why Sengoku's ability isn't godly per se. Something like "Hito Hito no mi, model: god" is absurd and completely empty as a concept.
God in one piece is NIKA, so Luffy's devil fruit is the Hito Hito no Mi, Model:god god (NIKA NIKA)- (Mythical)zoan
Post automatically merged:

...So? That doesn't support that a "god" fruit must exist since we have Chopper's ability; there are tons of mythical humanoids that aren't gods and would fit. Even in Sengoku's case, Oda made sure he didn't have the literal Budha power but its representation, hence why Sengoku's ability isn't godly per se. Something like "Hito Hito no mi, model: god" is absurd and completely empty as a concept.
God in one piece is NIKA, so Luffy's devil fruit is the Hito Hito no Mi, Model:god god (NIKA NIKA)- (Mythical)zoan
it will translate into god (not necessarily called god) or could be god in another religion (sungod NIKA). it will be a mythical zoan fruit with name that translates to god or similar
Post automatically merged:

Luffy ate the hito hito no mi: model Jesus Christ
you almost got it
Post automatically merged:

...So? That doesn't support that a "god" fruit must exist since we have Chopper's ability; there are tons of mythical humanoids that aren't gods and would fit. Even in Sengoku's case, Oda made sure he didn't have the literal Budha power but its representation, hence why Sengoku's ability isn't godly per se. Something like "Hito Hito no mi, model: god" is absurd and completely empty as a concept.
WHERE ARE YOU????
 
Last edited:
#18
God in one piece is NIKA, so Luffy's devil fruit is the Hito Hito no Mi, Model:god god (NIKA NIKA)- (Mythical)zoan
it will translate into god (not necessarily called god) or could be god in another religion (sungod NIKA). it will be a mythical zoan fruit with name that translates to god or similar
I was avoiding the spoilers I would have seen if I had read your quote from last tuesday, so I will start by reporting you.

Secondly, I wasn't denying the posibility of a godly model of the Hito Hito but the reasoning that "If there is a Human human devil fruit, then there should be a god god devil fruit". No, it shouldn't; mythical humanoids like Onyudo (which we have a fruit of), Umibozu, etc. aren't gods yet would represent mythical versions of the Hito Hito, so the inference you made wasn't properly built.

In this case you were right by chance (seemingly; we will get to that with the mods), but your train of thought was a mess; that's what I was criticizing (and everybody can guess by chance) because, either I misread your Nika mention, hence why addressed your theory as "Hito Hito no mi, model: god" instead of "Nika", or you edited after spoilers came out in order to make it look like you explicitly mentioned Nika from the start...

...which fits the fact that you've been editing the opening post since tuesday after spoilers were published; what did you add to your post when you edited it on tuesday, 1:01 PM? Because I've checked and back in sunday there was no "Nika" in the title, only "...there should be a god god devil fruit".

I could have made a mistake, of course, so let's allow moderators to check your activity in case you've been pretending to theorize while spoiling us all —which you did anyways when you quoted me on tuesday with information from the spoilers that shouldn't be commented outside its thread. Fine?
 
Top