Powers & Abilities If Zoro is a Swordsman, then so is Shanks...

#42
But he's not a Swordsman pursing the WSS path so he is irrelevant as a Swordsman..
Stop it all swordmen are under Wss. The world of op and the author acknowledge mihawk as the strongest your cherry picked criteria doesn't matter. Another "pure" or "true" swordsman argument that's fan made. Shanks is a swordsman every thing about him is a swordsman. Characters like Cavendish Zoro cabaji hachi law Fuji brook and law count as swordmen and all fall under mihawk. Shanks is no different.
 
#44
Stop it all swordmen are under Wss. The world of op and the author acknowledge mihawk as the strongest your cherry picked criteria doesn't matter. Another "pure" or "true" swordsman argument that's fan made. Shanks is a swordsman every thing about him is a swordsman. Characters like Cavendish Zoro cabaji hachi law Fuji brook and law count as swordmen and all fall under mihawk. Shanks is no different.
Not all Swordsmen aim for the WSS.. Many fight with a Sword just because it's been the weapon of choice for centuries..

You don't know that
lf you accept that Haki Swordsmen only put Haki in their Blade.. Then the logic follows the same for AdCoC which is not on the Blade but a field around the blade..
 
#45
Not all Swordsmen aim for the WSS.. Many fight with a Sword just because it's been the weapon of choice for centuries..


lf you accept that Haki Swordsmen only put Haki in their Blade.. Then the logic follows the same for AdCoC which is not on the Blade but a field around the blade..
It doesn't matter if you aim for it most don't. They all fall under it because they are swordmen. If a swordsman is stronger than mihawk they'd be the Wss not because the character aimed for it but because the world would acknowledge them as it over mihawk. If nobody ever challenged mihawk again once he got to old and weak or died the world would acknowledge another Wss because it's the world accepting you as the best.
 
#46
At this point this debate is redundant.

For the matter, it's factual that a character who fights with a sword can be denied the label of swordsman (King); that a sword that cuts everything may not be considered a real sword and that the strongest swordsman is (at least partially) defined by the extent to which they can choose what to cut instead of their overall strength (Koushiro); and that the concept of swordsmanship has been consistently nuanced throughout the story (Mihawk's skill stressed to be above Shanks's instead of going for his overall strength, Shanks not being addressed as a dai-kengou even though weaker characters like Vista, Ushimaru or current Zoro being so, Law lecturing Tashigi on what makes a swordsman...).

I don't know, for what I care Oda could write a panel on Mihawk being stronger than Shanks in next chapter and I would be fine with it. But it's dishonest that people assume the swordsmanship issue is so simplistic when Oda has made sure to make it the contrary. The fact that Zoro's dream isn't exactly becoming the strongest swordsman but the strongest/greatest/whatever you want to call it dai-kengou is quite telling by itself because, to begin with, dai-kengou doesn't even seem to be a label directly related to strength but something else that allows weaker swordsmen (Vista, Ushimaru) to be considered great swordsmen above stronger sword users (Shanks, Big Mom).

And heck, this is a Japanese story; odds are swordsmanship in this universe is way more complex than just fighting with a sword.
 
#48
White Beard was not chasing the title of the strongest man, Kaido not was chasing the title of the strongest being. But they had those titles.
So far every "strongest swordsman" we've encountered actively aimed at becoming the top in their field. Ryuma roamed the world seeking strong foes, Mihawk challenged every swordsman he encountered until he had no rival left and Zoro's whole dream is about it.

WSS isn't like WSM or WSC at all. It's a title you seek, not a title you're passively given.
 
Top