Break Week In Jaya, Luffy didn't understand what Shanks was saying!

#1
He lets himself be beaten by Bellamy's gang without replying to do like Shanks in volume 1 with the mountain brigants. But afterwards, Shanks tells the robbers when they go after child Luffy: "Whether you spill alcohol and food on me, spit on me, okay again. But I will not tolerate anyone attacking one of my friends!".
However in Jaya, the band of Bellamy also attacks Zoro and Luffy does nothing. :seriously:
 
Last edited:
#6
Because to him, Zoro is someone he's willing to just downright share his pain with. He doesn't feel the need to protect or coddle- and he's fine his right hand going through shit over his own incentive (or perhaps Zoro understood, too).

Anyway, call it trust or selfishness, that was it.

If it had been Chopper or Nami or most others, Luffy would've slaughtered them on spot.
 

Dickie D. Dick

SII - Sakazuki Incinerate Imu
#7
Because to him, Zoro is someone he's willing to just downright share his pain with. He doesn't feel the need to protect or coddle- and he's fine his right hand going through shit over his own incentive (or perhaps Zoro understood, too).

Anyway, call it trust or selfishness, that was it.

If it had been Chopper or Nami or most others, Luffy would've slaughtered them on spot.
Goofy ordered Zoro to not do anything
Goofy is shit captain
 

Nikuzi

⚓𝒫𝒾𝓇𝒶𝓉𝑒 𝒬𝓊𝑒𝑒𝓃 𝒮𝑒𝓃𝒸𝒽𝑜𝓊⚓
#9
Zoro and Luffy are strong enough to take a beating from fodder and not give a fuck, but if Usopp, Nami, or Chopper got attacked by Bellamy's gang Luffy and Zoro would have sent them packing in body bags
 
#10
It's cos Zoro was strong too so he didn't see him as someone he needed to protect - whatever beating they gave to Zoro, Luffy knew they could stomp em all at anytime

If it was a weaker Strawhat Luffy would've bodied them but I still think it was a cheap imitation. I never liked the scene, though the pay off with the Bellamy one-shot was great.
 
#13
How is it wrong? Goofy retarded af have his underling getting beaten by trash pirates
The diference is: Zoro could murder every single one of Belami's pirates if he wanted to, kid Luffy couldnt defend himself against mountain bandits.

If Bellamy raised a hand against nami on another hand, they would have fucked up Bellamy and gang Franky house style
 
#14
I mean, BB pretty much confirmed that Luffy was right to act like that, that was the point of the scenes. "When you aim high you come across fights not worth fighting. Let them laugh."
 
#19
Also not mentioned so far is that Luffy and Zoro had both promised Nami they wouldn’t fight anyone in Jaya, so they were keeping their word as well as they could
 
H

Herrera95

#20
Bandits were gonna kill Kid Luffy
Zoro was gonna massacre Bellamy Pirates
Not sure what your point is but they could have killed Luffy and Zoro and they would have died without fighting back.

Bad moment for Luffy and not sure if it was good moment for Zoro for trusting so hard in his captain(stupid captain).
 
Top