im not claiming that it, linguistically, do not exist, what i claimed is that, it, objectively, is untrue, that's why i said it's all subjective
Linguistically exist =/= Objectively true
Here i quote the very definition of said words
"A
plot contrivance is when you dismantle core concepts and rework them JUST to have one scene or JUST to have a political agenda, with no logic or reason beyond that." (
https://www.writingforums.org/threads/plot-holes-plot-contrivances-and-nitpick-critiques.161366/#:~:text=A plot contrivance is when,logic or reason beyond that.)
"no logic or reason beyond that"
now the question relies on what logic do we base it on? fiction logics? real life logics?
Since it's a fiction, of course, objectively, it's more appropriate to judge it based on the fiction logics. If we judge it based on real life logics, would you call a vampire-based anime plot contrivance filled anime since it defies our real life logic?
So to talk objectively, you have to present a breakdown on said fiction's physics before judging if it has plot contrivances