People who still deny Mihawk having conquered Haki are pretty much on the same level of stupdity to me as people back in the day arguing over whether or not Roger had it. We know he has to have it because his title is worthy of it.
Mihawk has the title that Zoro attempts to reach, and Zoro explicitly has Conquerors Haki. Zoros kingly ambition, despite being downplayed by lots of clowns because only he wants to do it, is being the world's strongest swordsman. That is this guys whole goal in life, being the strongest:
All jokes aside, if anybody honestly believes Mihawk does not have conquerors, explain to me logically why the fuck Zoro has conquerors for chasing a dream that Mihawk has already accomplished, but Mihawk himself does not have CoC.
Like, the best case scenario at this point anybody in the Mihawk hater crowd can hope for when it comes to him not having CoC? Is the fan theory that you can lose it if you become too depressed or achieve your goal. But if Mihawk has to be actively nerfed by being too strong to be beat by having CoC?
This story wouldn't be called One Piece, but Mihawk's tragic tale of suffering from success or one slash man for simplicity's sake.