This is me D1.
.........................
Anyone else who think i provided nothing on Gambit?
I gave enough and lot lot lot more even on D2 than Nat did entire Game.
What were her reasons, Hunch, Gambit explaining only mechanics and no reads/scum hunting? (playing another Game explains that?) Because i dont remember anything else from her.
Here's mine D2 Reasons.
This is my first post this day phase on Gambit. Asserting my deductions were right from D2.
Second, where i imply why Rayan didn't defend him well and was content to be lynched instead of Gambit because Gambit has powerful Mafia role. Same reason why he gave such big reactn D1, his lynch would have costed Mafia their Game and again why Rayan commited the mistake of voting for Gambit the way he did. Mafia usually avoid this D1.
Then Gambit showing concern for players hinting his role to lynch him.
Then i tried hinting it again.
I didn't read rest of the posts, if he implied someone else being Cop, do correct me here if that was the case. But i believe he believed i was a cop hinting my Night activity by being so sure on him, as hinted by his next post.
I would have normally taken this positively that he believed me.. Faking Cop Role because a player knows his role, but this came after my posts of Caught you scum, so it was more redemption for slipping and believing me a Cop before.
Furthermore, i told that Dragomir also caught Rayan being content with the lynch, and probably why he got killed. Because he was definitely coming after Gambit and Gambit could fake it as being obvious set up.
I did similar thing in one of the Games, my role was useful and a powerful one and my scum buddies tried to protect me and lynch Reborn instead. And Godfather clearly is most important Mafia role this Game.
Rayan was Mafia Goon and Gambit is Godfather, if one go so far to consider this for a moment, each dots connects and hence i can ignore the possibility of this being a setup. I would consider that in a situation where i am unsure of my reads and i dont have enough on the person.
But i had enough to cast vote on him D2 alone. It was Rayan or Gambit, either would give me clue on the other. This day phase, i see him flipping Godfather and those voting For Cobra or defending him are sus in my eyes..
So Nat saying i provided nothing while on her own she never made a case on Gambit is bad.
Not because she never made any case on Gambit? NO, she usually do this in all Games. But portraying / implying i provided none when i believe i provided more than everyone else on Gambit, and i even quoted her so she couldn't have missed them either.
Shifting lynch to Cobra who obviously is new and bad at this Game still, and refusing to see these reasons which i would expect a Serial Killer to do this phase, make her Scum in my eyes. And saying it's too easy is bad coverup for it.
If Godfather is lynched this day phase, the game will be streched enough for SK to also get caught. And so would SK react to last Mafia being lynched, he would try to get more townies out by creating confusion and allowing Godfather to kill one more scum Night phase.
And If she's townie, that's bad gameplay in my book. I can only let active Scum hunter pass on such Gameplay thinking it was a strategy, i expect such from only experienced players and Not Nat, who don't even give reads beside Hunches/Gut feelings.
There's big difference btween Zara n Gambit. If you can't see that you have lot to learn Nat.
I guess that's why you are voting for Cobra.
Not taking Credit, bt i also sussed Tac in the very next Posts. Told Zara wasn't scum. 😏
Anyone else who think i provided nothing on Gambit?
I gave enough and lot lot lot more even on D2 than Nat did entire Game.
What were her reasons, Hunch, Gambit explaining only mechanics and no reads/scum hunting? (playing another Game explains that?) Because i dont remember anything else from her.
Here's mine D2 Reasons.
😏 Have you been ever able to explain your sus? Expecting from others.
I will talk Townie language, if you are one you will understand
Gambit n Rayan are Linked and yet they are not.
I will talk Townie language, if you are one you will understand
Gambit n Rayan are Linked and yet they are not.
Rayan decisive vote despite sussing someone else, when it was btwen Zara n Gambit.
Them not interacting entire D1 phase. Gambit townclearing Tac when asked by Neutral, avoiding NW reasons for sussing him and then NW vs Gambit happened.
On surface he is best suspect to kill NW and hence he could be towncleared for same reason assuming he is being framed, so that makes it possible for Gambit to do it. NW was on to both Tac n Gambit. Also Jew tho.
Most reasons are tinfoil i know.
Here's another Reborn was not killed off, one reason could be he is scum himself bt i townread him, so second i.e his sus were rights. And they included Rayan, Gambit n Tac. Zara being wrong. Third, he could be protected.
Now aside from these... i will accept his reaction looked genuine to me, bt i changed my stance on that, scum can also be frustrated because Reborn reasons for sussing him don't look right on surface. Al Choosing him because he is experienced player and etc.
I also employed process of elimination, leaving me out unsure on these players.
Anyway, his flip will tell us the most, gives last day phase votes, about the voters and non voters.
Want more, Nat?
Them not interacting entire D1 phase. Gambit townclearing Tac when asked by Neutral, avoiding NW reasons for sussing him and then NW vs Gambit happened.
On surface he is best suspect to kill NW and hence he could be towncleared for same reason assuming he is being framed, so that makes it possible for Gambit to do it. NW was on to both Tac n Gambit. Also Jew tho.
Most reasons are tinfoil i know.
Here's another Reborn was not killed off, one reason could be he is scum himself bt i townread him, so second i.e his sus were rights. And they included Rayan, Gambit n Tac. Zara being wrong. Third, he could be protected.
Now aside from these... i will accept his reaction looked genuine to me, bt i changed my stance on that, scum can also be frustrated because Reborn reasons for sussing him don't look right on surface. Al Choosing him because he is experienced player and etc.
I also employed process of elimination, leaving me out unsure on these players.
Anyway, his flip will tell us the most, gives last day phase votes, about the voters and non voters.
Want more, Nat?
Second, where i imply why Rayan didn't defend him well and was content to be lynched instead of Gambit because Gambit has powerful Mafia role. Same reason why he gave such big reactn D1, his lynch would have costed Mafia their Game and again why Rayan commited the mistake of voting for Gambit the way he did. Mafia usually avoid this D1.
Then Gambit showing concern for players hinting his role to lynch him.
Then i tried hinting it again.
I didn't read rest of the posts, if he implied someone else being Cop, do correct me here if that was the case. But i believe he believed i was a cop hinting my Night activity by being so sure on him, as hinted by his next post.
I would have normally taken this positively that he believed me.. Faking Cop Role because a player knows his role, but this came after my posts of Caught you scum, so it was more redemption for slipping and believing me a Cop before.
Furthermore, i told that Dragomir also caught Rayan being content with the lynch, and probably why he got killed. Because he was definitely coming after Gambit and Gambit could fake it as being obvious set up.
I did similar thing in one of the Games, my role was useful and a powerful one and my scum buddies tried to protect me and lynch Reborn instead. And Godfather clearly is most important Mafia role this Game.
Rayan was Mafia Goon and Gambit is Godfather, if one go so far to consider this for a moment, each dots connects and hence i can ignore the possibility of this being a setup. I would consider that in a situation where i am unsure of my reads and i dont have enough on the person.
But i had enough to cast vote on him D2 alone. It was Rayan or Gambit, either would give me clue on the other. This day phase, i see him flipping Godfather and those voting For Cobra or defending him are sus in my eyes..
So Nat saying i provided nothing while on her own she never made a case on Gambit is bad.
Not because she never made any case on Gambit? NO, she usually do this in all Games. But portraying / implying i provided none when i believe i provided more than everyone else on Gambit, and i even quoted her so she couldn't have missed them either.
Shifting lynch to Cobra who obviously is new and bad at this Game still, and refusing to see these reasons which i would expect a Serial Killer to do this phase, make her Scum in my eyes. And saying it's too easy is bad coverup for it.
If Godfather is lynched this day phase, the game will be streched enough for SK to also get caught. And so would SK react to last Mafia being lynched, he would try to get more townies out by creating confusion and allowing Godfather to kill one more scum Night phase.
And If she's townie, that's bad gameplay in my book. I can only let active Scum hunter pass on such Gameplay thinking it was a strategy, i expect such from only experienced players and Not Nat, who don't even give reads beside Hunches/Gut feelings.
There's big difference btween Zara n Gambit. If you can't see that you have lot to learn Nat.
I guess that's why you are voting for Cobra.
After asking for good arguments from him?
