Status
Not open for further replies.
I like Tama okay, and I want to see Jinbee in action, but this is a lackluster chapter, but hopefully we will get some important info. The next chapter though I truly hope will have Sanji vs Queen & Zoro back in action! I wouldn't mind seeing some of Robin's fight, but it looks like Oda's gonna off panel it :few:
 
M

mckengrie

Btw guy

I looked korean spoiler and at the talkop translation of the Korean spoiler. The parts about Shanks and Luffy seem to be wrong. Who's Who hates Shanks for stealing the Gomu Gomu no fruit. But Luffy puts on Shanks' hat and Luffy eat the fruit (gomu gomu no) becomes a target for him. So he's not angry at Luffy for that.
 
Its really hard to believe its not Fisher Tiger, even if the name is different it could be an alias. Or someone who was saved by Fisher Tiger.
Was WsW a slave in Marijoie or somewhere else?
 

BangOO🍅

Pepebusi Spammer
Btw guy

I looked korean spoiler and at the talkop translation of the Korean spoiler. The parts about Shanks and Luffy seem to be wrong. Who's Who hates Shanks for stealing the Gomu Gomu no fruit. But Luffy puts on Shanks' hat and Luffy eat the fruit (gomu gomu no) becomes a target for him. So he's not angry at Luffy for that.
:kaidowhat:
 

Sir Tuna Sandwich II

SII - Sakazuki Incinerate Imu
Germa colour scheme shows us the strawhat hierarchy.

1. Oneji = Red = Luffy
2. Twoji = Blue = Jimbe
3. Sanji
4. Fourji = Green = Zoro
So Luffy, Jinbei and Luffy beating the crap out of Sanji for being failure?
Post automatically merged:

If one piece ends up getting axed cause of crybabies like yall, you're gonna make my poor cow jump off a cliff (not literally) but shitttt man y'all need to grow up.
Tama-chan gave them hard reality-check, now they know Oda don't give a fuck about their fav :suresure:
 
Last edited:
was did not believe it either until I took the time to actually read revelations as well. You should read it as well.
Should I blow your mind? Do you know that the Bible never actually condemns homosexuality?

im sure you think it does or you have heard somewhere that it does or you can even google it and someone will link a bible verse that “supposedly” does. But they don’t. Nope. No actual bible verse in the Bible does.

But people all over the world chose random statements from the Bible and added their own words and biases and suddenly, it’s now a world wide known statement that the Bible condemns homosexuality, when it does not.

So my guy, none of the shit you read in revelations actually matters or amounts to anything. You saw a YouTube video of someone adding their own words and biases to random statements in revelations for their agenda and now you believe that YouTube video.

you think you actually read something meaningful but you did not. Someone gave you an idea and used unconnected out of context Bible statements to make you believe their idea. The same way everyone thinks homosexuality is condemned in the Bible because someone came up with this idea and used unconnected out of context Bible statements to make people believe it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top