News One Piece Live Action Series!!
what is BS when the producer used only one tech for whole production: fish eye character in the center of the screen? I mean when producer has zero experience and episode in way that it can be used in tik tok, what else you can expect?
For example in 2 episode you even didn't got feeling that scene is happening on the sea. There is no waves effect
For example in 2 episode you even didn't got feeling that scene is happening on the sea. There is no waves effect
There is nothing wrong with using fish eyes lmao. And the affirmation that they only used fish eyes is fundamentally false. Multiple types of lenses were used. People who don't understand cinematography should speak less and let people who know enjoy :)
"No wave effects". Lmao what is this critic? Like I said BS hatred just for the fun of it by people who don't even read OP. Very similar to how people here criticize the manga : on wind.
I'm pretty sure they are the same people in fact
"No wave effects". Lmao what is this critic? Like I said BS hatred just for the fun of it by people who don't even read OP. Very similar to how people here criticize the manga : on wind.
I'm pretty sure they are the same people in fact
Yes, there is nothing wrong with using a fish-eye, but there are many things wrong when you use it all the time. Do you know how this effect was created, and how far the camera should be from the actor's face? The person who made that video is a producer, so he knows what he is talking about.
Again producer from the first 2 episodes has ZERO experience, compared to other producers who made other episodes.
As for the sea waves effect, I mentioned it, because in the scene where Merry was crossing the Red Line camera was stable, while it was moving in episode 3, for example. More to that, getting up on the Red Line should be much easier than falling from it. While in the episode, it was shown directly opposite. Which means that producer KAREN who lacks experience and knowledge made bad product.
Again producer from the first 2 episodes has ZERO experience, compared to other producers who made other episodes.
As for the sea waves effect, I mentioned it, because in the scene where Merry was crossing the Red Line camera was stable, while it was moving in episode 3, for example. More to that, getting up on the Red Line should be much easier than falling from it. While in the episode, it was shown directly opposite. Which means that producer KAREN who lacks experience and knowledge made bad product.
I also know cinema myself and there is one thing that is fundamental in art is that the sentence "it shouldn't be used like that" was always pronounced by people who don't understand art for the most part. A producer is not a cinematographer nor a director.
There is nothing wrong with using a fish-eye EVEN if it is used withing the entirerity of a creation (which is not what happened here, since other lenses were used.). Furthermore, the fish-eyes are used with care in One Piece and for good artistic reason which have good impacts on people (aside from a loud minority like yourself).
1. A producer is someone who seek for fundings, it's usually not the one who gives the artistic directions (they can, but it's not systematic)
2. Wether or not the producers have experience or not I don't know (probably they do since they already worked on the first season)
3. The first two episodes are amazing. Not perfect, but amazing. not only that, but it had an amazing reception too. So this argument is pure BS.
And ? Who cares ? I enjoyed the moment like many people. Therefore the choice of direction was not bad.
No. There is something called gravity. Check it out.
Are you a bot?
There is nothing wrong with using a fish-eye EVEN if it is used withing the entirerity of a creation (which is not what happened here, since other lenses were used.). Furthermore, the fish-eyes are used with care in One Piece and for good artistic reason which have good impacts on people (aside from a loud minority like yourself).
1. A producer is someone who seek for fundings, it's usually not the one who gives the artistic directions (they can, but it's not systematic)
2. Wether or not the producers have experience or not I don't know (probably they do since they already worked on the first season)
3. The first two episodes are amazing. Not perfect, but amazing. not only that, but it had an amazing reception too. So this argument is pure BS.
And ? Who cares ? I enjoyed the moment like many people. Therefore the choice of direction was not bad.
No. There is something called gravity. Check it out.
Are you a bot?
You didn't watch this video at all.
Anyway, this is an example of a bad scene director:
Look here, Smoker, who is supposed to be a BIG man, with BIG muscles, looks like a regular Marine. All his awesomeness was lost in one bad scene. From a threat, he became a guy from that bar, or from a cosplay event.
In good art direction, this would never happen. You can use wide screens, but because of the wide screens, your characters shouldn't lose aura.
Another scene would be like this:
Because of the choice of director, you can see how Luffy is trying to escape by hitting the ground with his hands, which looks stupid.
Again, this is why 2 episodes look like fan-made cosplay parody. When you lack experience, you lack skills.
And the last scene that I will use as example will be this one:
Don't lie to me, you didn't get a feeling of impact here, do you? That is another scene that became cheap because SOMEONE don't know how to do HER JOB.
What is more important, such mistakes never happened in episode 3-8. Which again just showes the roots of the problem
Anyway, this is an example of a bad scene director:
Look here, Smoker, who is supposed to be a BIG man, with BIG muscles, looks like a regular Marine. All his awesomeness was lost in one bad scene. From a threat, he became a guy from that bar, or from a cosplay event.
In good art direction, this would never happen. You can use wide screens, but because of the wide screens, your characters shouldn't lose aura.
Another scene would be like this:
Because of the choice of director, you can see how Luffy is trying to escape by hitting the ground with his hands, which looks stupid.
Again, this is why 2 episodes look like fan-made cosplay parody. When you lack experience, you lack skills.
And the last scene that I will use as example will be this one:
Don't lie to me, you didn't get a feeling of impact here, do you? That is another scene that became cheap because SOMEONE don't know how to do HER JOB.
What is more important, such mistakes never happened in episode 3-8. Which again just showes the roots of the problem
Lmao. Not only is this a bad analysis, it's also a bad conclusion. This is what happen when frustrated One Piece man-child fans on youtube or elsewhere try to use a medium they obviously don't understand to make assumptions. In this scene, I can tell you that the power of Smoker is absolutely omnipresent. And it's not a question of fisheye, it's a question of framing, of proportion, of camera angle, of sizing and direction of actors.
Just stop talking and stop listening to people who don't understand the craft.
Actually no. It doesn't. It shows how Luffy is frustrated not because he is trying to escape but because of the sheer force that Smokers is applying to his face. If you look closely at the acting of Inaki, you will see that he is doing something he has never done before and will never do again in the rest of this specific season : He transforms Luffy here in a frustrated animal who is just angry at his opponent. Very Luffy like in reality, it's one of the moment where Inaki is the closest to Luffy in the entirerity of the show. Again, bad analysis.
You are not supposed to feel the impact. Laboon is supposed to be un unbreakable wall for Luffy here, something that could snap him in half if he wanted. The fact that Luffy was not even able to make his eyelead move is showing how strong Laboon really is.
Again, you miss the fact that this is not the manga, it's an adaptation of the manga and the directors have to project the threats and the differences of power differently.
Nevermind me.. you won't understand that.
Just stop talking and stop listening to people who don't understand the craft.
Actually no. It doesn't. It shows how Luffy is frustrated not because he is trying to escape but because of the sheer force that Smokers is applying to his face. If you look closely at the acting of Inaki, you will see that he is doing something he has never done before and will never do again in the rest of this specific season : He transforms Luffy here in a frustrated animal who is just angry at his opponent. Very Luffy like in reality, it's one of the moment where Inaki is the closest to Luffy in the entirerity of the show. Again, bad analysis.
You are not supposed to feel the impact. Laboon is supposed to be un unbreakable wall for Luffy here, something that could snap him in half if he wanted. The fact that Luffy was not even able to make his eyelead move is showing how strong Laboon really is.
Again, you miss the fact that this is not the manga, it's an adaptation of the manga and the directors have to project the threats and the differences of power differently.
Nevermind me.. you won't understand that.
Last edited:
