Role Madness One Piece Mash 2.0

[bittersweet]

Tbh if anything it makes me feel better about Ekko if anything. Alexis ability was giving him "current census" on on D3. Ekko's is start of the game census. Pretty sure exact same thing happened in one of Fuji's Bleach game. I had D3 census and pushed other Town who got it earlier.

Ekko's one informs you that there are 3 indies, alexis' one informs you which faction culted people went to. Like, maybe mafia can cult 1 person or sth. For example.

Current census and regular census aren't the same thing i mean

So effectively cult and mafia have made things tougher for town with pushing the mislynch on Alexis

 

[bittersweet]

They aren’t conflicting tho?

But we don't know for certain it is real. Not saying it isn't. I just feel a little paranoid after my past few games.

 

[Charlie]

EkkoLoJinx: Lord Melkor

@Lord Melkor

That was 3rd person to vote anyone D1. Hasn't moved since

 

[Charlie]

So effectively cult and mafia have made things tougher for town with pushing the mislynch on Alexis

Or got lucky af. Either or

 

[Hayumi]

I’ll humor the Ekko direction based off his actual threadplay so far being underwhelming. I don’t find his census scummy, even less so now that we have another flipped town role with an up to date census vs starting census.

 

[bittersweet]

Or got lucky af. Either or

I could see luck. They were pushing him for being more reserved this game and not tunneling towncore

 

[Yoho]

@Duckt

Has the murder of your partner unlocked your inner evil and switched you to the dark side?

 

[Charlie]

I’ll humor the Ekko direction based off his actual threadplay so far being underwhelming. I don’t find his census scummy, even less so now that we have another flipped town role with an up to date census vs starting census.

Gimme your take on Orca pls.

 

[Lord Melkor]

I don’t really see what else there is for him to say if he’s telling the truth. Both abilities are still distinctly different.

Cnsus will be irrelevant to his alignment.

wh

I’ll humor the Ekko direction based off his actual threadplay so far being underwhelming. I don’t find his census scummy, even less so now that we have another flipped town role with an up to date census vs starting census.

I am fine with it

Vote Lynch Ekko

 

[bittersweet]

I’ll humor the Ekko direction based off his actual threadplay so far being underwhelming. I don’t find his census scummy, even less so now that we have another flipped town role with an up to date census vs starting census.

Can we at least get him to full claim or give more of a claim?

 

[Hayumi]

Vote Lynch Ekko

 

[bittersweet]

@Duckt your thoughts on Ekko?

 

[Charlie]

I could see luck. They were pushing him for being more reserved this game and not tunneling towncore

I mean, many people have hate bonner for alexis in general for his trolling. It's pretty easy target for mislynch.

 

[Lord Melkor]

So I was just looking for an effort to respond in some way. I think Paragorn and Udell failed, so definitely at the top range of my scum suspects today

So your solve so far are inactive players?

 

[Lord Melkor]

Gimme your take on Orca pls.

I am not Hayumi but skimming through his posts he is usually more obvious as town in recent games, he is vocal and has strong directions

 

[Hayumi]

Gimme your take on Orca pls.

I really don’t remember much of him tbh

 

[Lord Melkor]

Charlie looks good from what i have seen so far

 

[bittersweet]

I mean, many people have hate bonner for alexis in general for his trolling. It's pretty easy target for mislynch.

I can see it. I was usually a target for him in a lot of my first few games as scum and would flip town

 

[bittersweet]

I really don’t remember much of him tbh

Only thing substantial was pressing everyone to watch that video and comment

 

[Charlie]

So your solve so far are inactive players?

Now reading this post you quoted...

It's basically "i posted fluff and tagged people, those who responded with their fluff are fine and those who didn't are sus".

Where's logic? If anything it says that these WHO responded aren't really inactive, just don't post in thread. Other 2 probably simply didn't see it. If anything, people who aren't posting what they're thinking but show up for fluff should be suspicious ones, no?