Role Madness One Piece Mash 2.0
- Thread starter Fujishiro
- Start date
- Tags admirals > yonkos cry about it carrot is doing nothing because she doesn't matter garling best gorosei goon valley the seven deadly kekkos
@Pot Goblin
Yeah, sure, but what are your win conditions?
(lol)
As a neutral, are you willing to vote for wolves that are voting for you, because they're being wolfy and also trying to kill you?
Is that a reasonable thing we can do together.
Yeah, sure, but what are your win conditions?
(lol)
As a neutral, are you willing to vote for wolves that are voting for you, because they're being wolfy and also trying to kill you?
Is that a reasonable thing we can do together.
What other pressure is there to apply, if you do an ISO on me you'll see I was hinting my role and my alignment since the start of the game. The claim wasn't out of desperation, it was always the plan once my shop got started up
Gimme a bit.
I want to actually iso them from start of game to actually do my diligence and look for reasons why my gut is wrong and theyre just town.
Half baked, rushed work I didn't even check for errors isn't presentable.
I can tell you the names but given I'm not voting for them, should tell you I am not ready to proceed.
I know this is just a game, and it's a guessing game, and it's like throwing darts, but at the same time.
I play in a manner resembling a juror or jurist in a real trial, in real life.
Each person is entitled to a defense, and their defense includes literally everything they've said all game, which must be taken into account.
Further, it is incumbent upon the prosecutor to do his job really well before showing up to court to persuade a jury.
Further, the jury's position should be innocent until shown to be guilty, and even then, it needs to be a lot of votes in agreement.
In this case, not unanimous like real life, because there won't actually be evidence of the mechanical kind on most players, so the burden of proof is less substantial, since we're throwing darts in a game setting.
But still, wagons for the sake of wagons for no reason is just accusing people of being a witch, which didn't work out so hot in real life for the innocent people burned at the stake.
The idea here is to hit guilty people, not random people.
I want to actually iso them from start of game to actually do my diligence and look for reasons why my gut is wrong and theyre just town.
Half baked, rushed work I didn't even check for errors isn't presentable.
I can tell you the names but given I'm not voting for them, should tell you I am not ready to proceed.
I know this is just a game, and it's a guessing game, and it's like throwing darts, but at the same time.
I play in a manner resembling a juror or jurist in a real trial, in real life.
Each person is entitled to a defense, and their defense includes literally everything they've said all game, which must be taken into account.
Further, it is incumbent upon the prosecutor to do his job really well before showing up to court to persuade a jury.
Further, the jury's position should be innocent until shown to be guilty, and even then, it needs to be a lot of votes in agreement.
In this case, not unanimous like real life, because there won't actually be evidence of the mechanical kind on most players, so the burden of proof is less substantial, since we're throwing darts in a game setting.
But still, wagons for the sake of wagons for no reason is just accusing people of being a witch, which didn't work out so hot in real life for the innocent people burned at the stake.
The idea here is to hit guilty people, not random people.
