you take what i said however you want

woman is a gender and gender is a spectrum, no one’s taking the word from anyone, they’re just using it to define their gender identity.
Aristotelian Laws of Thought and Logic:

Law of Identity: A concept or object that shares the same properties are identical. "A is A, B is B."
If A does not share the properties of B, they are not identical.

Law of Non-Contradiction: Either A or Not-A, an object or concept either is or isn't. It cannot be both opposites.

Law of Excluded Middle: A concept either has or does not have a property or distinction. A is A or Not-A it cannot be or.

Now apply this to gender.
Women and Men have certain distinctions that both don't share, Law of Identity.
Women and Men are opposites in those distinctions, so you can't be both (herms are infertile).
Those distinctions make you either man or woman, Law of Non-Contradiction.
Law of Excluded Middle, Man or Women no or aka NB.

Logic sound.
 

MonsterZoro

Bald Spoiler Provider
Aristotelian Laws of Thought and Logic:

Law of Identity: A concept or object that shares the same properties are identical. "A is A, B is B."
If A does not share the properties of B, they are not identical.

Law of Non-Contradiction: Either A or Not-A, an object or concept either is or isn't. It cannot be both opposites.

Law of Excluded Middle: A concept either has or does not have a property or distinction. A is A or Not-A it cannot be or.

Now apply this to gender.
Women and Men have certain distinctions that both don't share, Law of Identity.
Women and Men are opposites in those distinctions, so you can't be both (herms are infertile).
Those distinctions make you either man or woman, Law of Non-Contradiction.
Law of Excluded Middle, Man or Women no or aka NB.

Logic sound.
I’m not gonna lie I don’t understand a single word you said here
 
Aristotelian Laws of Thought and Logic:

Law of Identity: A concept or object that shares the same properties are identical. "A is A, B is B."
If A does not share the properties of B, they are not identical.

Law of Non-Contradiction: Either A or Not-A, an object or concept either is or isn't. It cannot be both opposites.

Law of Excluded Middle: A concept either has or does not have a property or distinction. A is A or Not-A it cannot be or.

Now apply this to gender.
Women and Men have certain distinctions that both don't share, Law of Identity.
Women and Men are opposites in those distinctions, so you can't be both (herms are infertile).
Those distinctions make you either man or woman, Law of Non-Contradiction.
Law of Excluded Middle, Man or Women no or aka NB.

Logic sound.
You clearly need some spoilers and some bitches too
 

CoC: Color of Clowns

You can do it! And you will!!!
Nah this is one interpretation and a pretty bad one
It means that we’re one flesh = equal
Man and woman are equal
This is the view of Alevism and I think most Christians think that too
I heard it from some Christians
Like, I have plenty of issues with the Old Testament, but, why in the Hell would God take something from Adam to create Eve if he already could create Adam?

Oh.

Welp, we've circled back to Lilith.

Does Lilith have any presence in Christianity, or is that just Judaism?
 
Top