Anime & Manga One Piece Spoilers - The Waiting Room

Biggest 2025 expectation?

  • Nami cutting her hair

    Votes: 10 11.6%

  • Shanks not having a twin

    Votes: 10 11.6%

  • Finding One Piece

    Votes: 2 2.3%

  • Imu face reveal

    Votes: 54 62.8%

  • Vegaskunk finally dying

    Votes: 10 11.6%
  • Total voters
    86
Drybones2015

Drybones2015

‎
#90,522
#90,522
Peroroncino said:
tbf it's only weird if you attracted to feet so they have good reason to pull the reverse card on you
Click to expand...
I'm not even attraction to feet, I am however socially aware. It's weird because there was literally no reason to do it. If she was barefoot as a kid it wouldn't have even been noticeable. But they literally took her shoes off and drew them behind her, for what reason? The decision itself is what's weird. But instead of just admitting that yeah it's odd, they just flipped out and started accusations. And to be clear I wasn't even accusing the artist of anything other that applying their love of feat to a piece about a child character. But they misrepresented my point, escalated it to full on child attraction, and threw it back at me. Who would have known being anti-child sexualization would be so controversial in an anime community...
 
Last edited:
Peroroncino

Peroroncino

🅷🅰🅻🅰 🅼🅰🅳🆁🅸🅳
‎
#90,524
#90,524
Drybones2015 said:
I'm not even attraction to feet, I am however socially aware. It's weird because there was literally no reason to do it. If she was barefoot as a kid it wouldn't have even been noticeable. But they literally took her shoes off and drew them behind her, for what reason? The decision itself is what's weird. But instead of just admitting that yeah it's odd, they just flipped out and started accusations. And to be clear I wasn't even accusing the artist of anything other that applying their love of feat to a piece about a child character. But they misrepresented my point, escalated it to full on child attraction, and through it back at me. Who would have know being anti-child sexualization would be so controversial in an anime community...
Click to expand...
I dont see what the problem is either way tbh.
Its just feet after all
 
ZoroMazino

ZoroMazino

‎
#90,525
#90,525
Drybones2015 said:
I'm not even attraction to feet, I am however socially aware. It's weird because there was literally no reason to do it. If she was barefoot as a kid it wouldn't have even been noticeable. But they literally took her shoes off and drew them behind her, for what reason? The decision itself is what's weird. But instead of just admitting that yeah it's odd, they just flipped out and started accusations. And to be clear I wasn't even accusing the artist of anything other that applying their love of feat to a piece about a child character. But they misrepresented my point, escalated it to full on child attraction, and through it back at me. Who would have know being anti-child sexualization would be so controversial in an anime community...
Click to expand...
 
Peppercore

Peppercore

(☝◞‸◟)☞ 𝚂𝚒𝚖𝚙
‎
#90,537
#90,537
Drybones2015 said:
Someone posted new official kid Yamato art on reddit. I commented how weird it is that the artist deliberately drew her without her shoes on and had her feet facing the perspective.

I've now upset some weirdos there and

They're trying to pull the uno reverse card real hard.
Click to expand...
saw u getting cooked but ur right. this is just foot fetish weirdness. i also see it a lot in child boa art for some reason. st range
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top