What makes you think I didn't consider them? I understand that there are reasons for it, but it's like I said - I can only read you based off of how far I think your reaction is from what I consider to be natural, and given that reacting to said claim from Ekko is something I would consider "natural", your lack of doing so warrants scrutiny. I never said it meant you had to be scum with no further room for argument. I have no way of actually verifying Point #3.
What about the other part of that post?
What about the other part of that post?