And yet you did not answer back about the fact that the Shinsengumi wore Blades?.. That's a historical fact..
Because the argument can be easily countered by Popular Culture..
The Shinsengumi is historical isn't.. They were wearing Swords..
They didn't though. Samurai were far more likely to use spears, pole arms and bows in actual battlefield combat than their swords throughout most of their history. Sure, they carried swords and knew how to use them but they weren't their actual primary weapon.
The reason they still had swords was also precisely because swords were never the primary battlefield combat weapon. The sword was a status symbol. Hence why when guns made the formerly efficient weapon choices such as spears, pole arms and bows obsolete, swords remained because their first and foremost purpose was to denote status.
The Shinsengumi weren't even formed as a proper battlefield unit either. They were basically a ceremonial bodyguard unit wielding swords in an era of ever increasing gunpowder based warfare. It would be the equivalent of pointing at the Swiss Guards and claiming that halberds are still being used for modern military purposes.
Any other dumb historical take you want to defend to your defiled dignity's final dying breath or are we done here?



.

