Physiological Question

[Zolo]

I believe we teach concepts to children too slowly. We seem to teach children linearly and beat them over the head with the same thing over and over again. Of course that would make learning boring and not very engaging. we spend multiple years on just subtraction addition, multiplication, and division. Something say a 7-year-old could pick up in a day or two if he was particularly interested. we waste even more time because division is exactly the same as fractions with a slightly different format. not only do I believe that from the age of 5 to 15 you could teach a normal child everything up to calc 2. The attempt I believe wouldn't leave children any dumber even if they struggled with the concept so do some mathematicians. While forcing children to drill hundreds if not thousands of the same problems over and over again may be our attempt to keep up with children who live overseas while practically purposefully separating children into passing and failing I'm sure is the reason why American engineering is in such a sad state and why American education is wildly seen as insufficient and embarrassing.

My idea is to make a physics book that is essentially 5000 pages long. This physics book will not only have physics but all subjects in it in a repeating pattern.for example.

Logic/philosophy
art
language (whatever language)
world history(not just American history or what ever country the readers live in)
Math
science
technology(ie coding and using programs and other electronic devices)
environment
music theory
general knowledge (this can anything that a child will find useful in life)

Making everything into one book written by one person on so many different subjects would be a good way to relate everything and show their connection and I believe would make for a smarter society.

Post automatically merged: Apr 22, 2023

what no response?

that book would be biased. One source is never good

 

[Owl Ki]

Seeing how grammar is your valid point for the better part of the day why don't you just concede that you know shit

Geez, it is almost like people are going to be inclined to doubt the ability of a person to be an educator for children when said person consistently mixes up words and concepts.

just googling things to make yourself seem like your more insightful than you really are.

Dude, you pulled the "my mom is" card on an anonymous forum. Lol.

and you waddled your fat dumb nonsensical weak ass in here and said that's psychology hur dur and have been arguing that for a good portion of the day.

Damn, getting that mad at a random bum that asks questions on the internet? God forbid you get questions from the general public/voter base who would be naturally concerned about their children's educational prospects under a person that apparently wants to put music theory in a physics book.

I mean think about what your saying and the arrogance with which your saying it.

Arrogance? Hey man, I wasn't the one to go onto a weeb forum and declare that I possessed the silver bullet solution to fix the education system of the nation with the largest GDP on the planet and forever more improve the society of said nation for future generations to come. That sure is some big game talk right there.

What would a psychiatrist add to this conversation? Make it make sense.

"What would an educational psychologist add to the subject of educating children?!? What I say!!!" said the supposed engineer with a degree in "Well my mom is one, so I know!".

 

[IsaziSempi]

that book would be biased. One source is never good

Geez, it is almost like people are going to be inclined to doubt the ability of a person to be an educator for children when said person consistently mixes up words and concepts.

Dude, you pulled the "my mom is" card on an anonymous forum. Lol.

Damn, getting that mad at a random bum that asks questions on the internet? God forbid you get questions from the general public/voter base who would be naturally concerned about their children's educational prospects under a person that apparently wants to put music theory in a physics book.

Arrogance? Hey man, I wasn't the one to go onto a weeb forum and declare that I possessed the silver bullet solution to fix the education system of the nation with the largest GDP on the planet and forever more improve the society of said nation for future generations to come. That sure is some big game talk right there.

"What would an educational psychologist add to the subject of educating children?!? What I say!!!" said the supposed engineer with a degree in "Well my mom is one, so I know!".

What does GDP even matter in this conversation. your pathetic shut up.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

you think kids should learn online?

Yes

There are reliable online sources

 

[Owl Ki]

your

You're.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

I don't think learning online is good. a nice physical book will teach you better than anything you'd find on the internet nowadays.

Nope

If by 'the internet' you mean twitter and worstgen you're right.

But that's not the whole internet.

 

[IsaziSempi]

Nope

If by 'the internet' you mean twitter and worstgen you're right.

But that's not the whole internet.

what online source do you think is good?

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

What would a psychiatrist add to this conversation?

"Stop it, son. Get some help."

 

[IsaziSempi]

"Stop it, son. Get some help."

you don't understand because you lack reading comprehension. typical american.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

you don't understand because you lack reading comprehension. typical american.

Ok now I'm convinced you're a troll

 

[Reborn]

Talk about being so much into one piece that you even advocated for One Book




On serious note, it's bad idea. Really bad idea

1) Publication cost will be high so not economically feasible for authors

2) Bulky books act as a deterrent.

Just take one piece - it's so lengthy that many people don't feel like taking it up for the read.

3) Most importantly, bulky books covering all subjects won't develop what you expect.

It comes from connecting the dots within subjects and across subjects which is a skill part - critical thinking. This depends on lot of factors and covering everything in one book isn't that factor.

4) You mentioned Physics and then say it should cover whole world history as well 😑

Two completely different subjects

 

[IsaziSempi]

Talk about being so much into one piece that you even advocated for One Book




On serious note, it's bad idea. Really bad idea

1) Publication cost will be high so not economically feasible for authors

2) Bulky books act as a deterrent.

Just take one piece - it's so lengthy that many people don't feel like taking it up for the read.

3) Most importantly, bulky books covering all subjects won't develop what you expect.

It comes from connecting the dots within subjects and across subjects which is a skill part - critical thinking. This depends on lot of factors and covering everything in one book isn't that factor.

4) You mentioned Physics and then say it should cover whole world history as well 😑

Two completely different subjects

I think you misunderstood what I mean also how books work.