Physiological Question

[IsaziSempi]

I believe we teach concepts to children too slowly. We seem to teach children linearly and beat them over the head with the same thing over and over again. Of course that would make learning boring and not very engaging. we spend multiple years on just subtraction addition, multiplication, and division. Something say a 7-year-old could pick up in a day or two if he was particularly interested. we waste even more time because division is exactly the same as fractions with a slightly different format. not only do I believe that from the age of 5 to 15 you could teach a normal child everything up to calc 2. The attempt I believe wouldn't leave children any dumber even if they struggled with the concept so do some mathematicians. While forcing children to drill hundreds if not thousands of the same problems over and over again may be our attempt to keep up with children who live overseas while practically purposefully separating children into passing and failing I'm sure is the reason why American engineering is in such a sad state and why American education is wildly seen as insufficient and embarrassing.

My idea is to make a physics book that is essentially 5000 pages long. This physics book will not only have physics but all subjects in it in a repeating pattern.for example.

Logic/philosophy
art
language (whatever language)
world history(not just American history or what ever country the readers live in)
Math
science
technology(ie coding and using programs and other electronic devices)
environment
music theory
general knowledge (this can anything that a child will find useful in life)

Making everything into one book written by one person on so many different subjects would be a good way to relate everything and show their connection and I believe would make for a smarter society.

Post automatically merged: Apr 22, 2023

what no response?

 

[York]

>psychological question

>no question

 

[Owl Ki]

what no response?

How many people on a weeb forum do you think are going to be genuinely interested in this shit?

>psychological question

>no question

Title is "Physiological Question".

Talks purely about psychology, not physiology.

This book of his has tripped before it even got to the starting line.

 

[K!NG HARA$H!MA]

Don't put too much pressure and complexity of issues on childrens.

Let em enjoy their time and have fun.
Childhood is often the best times of life for most people

 

[TheAncientCenturion]

I don’t have a good enough background in education to make an educated post on the subject.

what no response?

 

[IsaziSempi]

How many people on a weeb forum do you think are going to be genuinely interested in this shit?

Title is "Physiological Question".

Talks purely about psychology, not physiology.

This book of his has tripped before it even got to the starting line.

how the brain develops is a physiology question not psychology. If I was asking a question about behavior I would say psychologist as that's the field of study that interest them. But how the brain works is a question for a physiologist because philologist care about how the human body works. I think the American education system has failed you son.

Post automatically merged: Apr 22, 2023

Don't put too much pressure and complexity of issues on childrens.

Let em enjoy their time and have fun.
Childhood is often the best times of life for most people

is that the best way to raise kids. that seems like the best way to raise kids unable to deal with real problems in society.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

>psychological question

>no question

He said 'physiological'

Relates even less to the op content

This book of his has tripped before it even got to the starting line.

Wait
HE wants to be the author of that book?

s. I think the American education system has failed you son.

Murican school system = L system


Ever checked out Vedic and Mayan maths?
This is how children should be taught maths! Makes much more sense

 

[Warchief Sanji D Goat]

Well, compiling everything into one single book is probably not a good idea. Won't the book be too heavy with 5000 pages though?

It's better to have multiple learning equipment for multiple different subjects.

And it's not that the society are teaching children too slowly, it's more of a useful and effective learning methods in life.

For example, no one would freaking use Calculus 2 in daily life unless you're pursuing a particular major that focuses on math and science. The education system should teach actual useful stuff like how to pay taxes, buy a house, etc.

Since these particular economic subjects I listed above are uncommonly teaches, poverty rates are rising due to lack of knowledge.

 

[Salah WG]

U think They really couldn't come up with better Education?
They just don't want to

 

[Owl Ki]

But how the brain works is a question for a physiologist because philologist care about how the human body works.

Spoiler

Just stop. The hole is already big enough mate.

Wait
HE wants to be the author of that book?

Apparently. That or pay somebody else to make it I guess.

My idea is to make a physics book that is essentially 5000 pages long. This physics book will not only have physics but all subjects in it in a repeating pattern.for example.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

philologist care about how the human body works. I think the American education system has failed you son.

These 2 sentences in succession

Btw at least one S is missing here.

Just stop. The hole is already big enough mate.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

[Owl Ki]

how the brain develops is a physiology question not psychology. If I was asking a question about behavior I would say psychologist as that's the field of study that interest them. But how the brain works is a question for a physiologist because philologist care about how the human body works. I think the American education system has failed you son.

Educational psychology.

Spoiler

https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-educational-psychology-2795157#:~:text=Educational psychology is the study,influences on the learning process.

Please stay away from education systems. They have suffered enough already as is.

 

[IsaziSempi]

He said 'physiological'

Relates even less to the op content

Wait
HE wants to be the author of that book?

Murican school system = L system


Ever checked out Vedic and Mayan maths?
This is how children should be taught maths! Makes much more sense

I'll have to look into that

Post automatically merged: Apr 22, 2023

Well, compiling everything into one single book is probably not a good idea. Won't the book be too heavy with 5000 pages though?

It's better to have multiple learning equipment for multiple different subjects.

And it's not that the society are teaching children too slowly, it's more of a useful and effective learning methods in life.

For example, no one would freaking use Calculus 2 in daily life unless you're pursuing a particular major that focuses on math and science. The education system should teach actual useful stuff like how to pay taxes, buy a house, etc.

Since these particular economic subjects I listed above are uncommonly teaches, poverty rates are rising due to lack of knowledge.

Nah it wouldn't be to heavy. You could just have the teacher print the pages as they go or have them pre-ordered and passed out everyday. The concept is just having the knowledge consistently related and in one place.

Post automatically merged: Apr 22, 2023

Educational psychology.

Spoiler

https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-educational-psychology-2795157#:~:text=Educational psychology is the study,influences on the learning process.

Please stay away from education systems. They have suffered enough already as is.

Did you just google psychologist until you found a field related to Education:lmao. That's pretty pathetic and above all you still missed the point. The question isn't how kids should be taught although it's perfectly fine to talk about here. The subject that I'm bringing up is child development and the human brain ability to understand information and process information. Whether or not Children have the capacity to understand very complex issues and concepts. I don't have a question about how children should be taught but rather about the physiology of a humans child. psychology is more about how people behave and how different stimli can influence the brain. Psycologist don't actually study how the brain works that is more the subject of a scientist. But congratulations on combining the word education and psychology. That was very impressive and deserves an A in my book.

On Subject: People are usually impressed by how well kids can understand concepts even at young ages and sometimes to the surprise of adults they can understand subjects better than the adults themselves. I know in the first grade I was bored with the ciricculum and was learning mutiplication from older students in the third grade. It's just baffling to me that they though they needed to wait two years to explain to me something an eight-year-old child taught me in a few minutes during latchkey. I think one of the reasons I became uninterested in school was because the slow pace and the disconnection from the applicable uses of everything I was learning. It's a huge waste of time. Even as an engineer I basically had to relearn everything because learning from worksheets spread over many years doesn't really equate to becoming scientifically literate.

 

[Oliver]

Most of this information is already available online, what's the point in compiling it into a book since most of it will be easily searchable on google?

Not only that information in subjects like the major sciences, history and general knowledge are constantly being updated. A 5000 page book may very well be obsolete by the time it gets written and published.

Edit: Follow your dreams though, if you think a book like this will make a difference be the change you want to see in the world!

 

[IsaziSempi]

Most of this information is already available online, what's the point in compiling it into a book since most of it will be easily searchable on google?

Not only that information in subjects like the major sciences, history and general knowledge are constantly being updated. A 5000 page book may very well be obsolete by the time it gets written and published.

you think kids should learn online?

 

[Oliver]

you think kids should learn online?

Most students already do. Half the university students I've ever met begin their research on a paper by going to wikipedia.

 

[Owl Ki]

The question isn't how kids should be taught

I believe we teach

Did you just google psychologist until you found a field related to Education:lmao. That's pretty pathetic and above all you still missed the point. The question isn't how kids should be taught although it's perfectly fine to talk about here. The subject that I'm bringing up is child development and the human brain ability to understand information and process information. Whether or not Children have the capacity to understand very complex issues and concepts. I don't have a question about how children should be taught but rather about the physiology of a humans child. psychology is more about how people behave and how different stimli can influence the brain. Psycologist don't actually study how the brain works that is more the subject of a scientist. But congratulations on combining the word education and psychology. That was very impressive and deserves an A in my book.

Mate, there are courses on this subject. Don't act like I just made something up.

Spoiler

https://www.mic.ul.ie/faculty-of-ed...e-in-educational-and-child-psychology?index=0

https://www.ucd.ie/education/study/doctoralprogrammes/

 

[IsaziSempi]

Mate, there are courses on this subject. Don't act like I just made something up.

Spoiler

https://www.mic.ul.ie/faculty-of-ed...e-in-educational-and-child-psychology?index=0

https://www.ucd.ie/education/study/doctoralprogrammes/

Yeah I know my mothers has her masters in this which is why I know it's off topic.

Post automatically merged: Apr 22, 2023

Most students already do. Half the university students I've ever met begin their research on a paper by going to wikipedia.

I don't think learning online is good. a nice physical book will teach you better than anything you'd find on the internet nowadays.

 

[Owl Ki]

Yeah I know my mothers has her masters in this which is why I know it's off topic.

"Muh, my mommy learned something! So that means all of her knowledge automatically transferred to me!!!"

Considering how you got a physiologist mixed up with a philologist, forgive me if I doubt this kind of argument on an anonymous forum.

 

[IsaziSempi]

"Muh, my mommy learned something! So that means all of her knowledge automatically transferred to me!!!"

Considering how you got a physiologist mixed up with a philologist, forgive me if I doubt this kind of argument on an anonymous forum.

That or my phone just autocorrected me. Seeing how grammar is your valid point for the better part of the day why don't you just concede that you know shit and are just googling things to make yourself seem like your more insightful than you really are. I mean I literally said you could teach a child all the way up to calc 2 from the ages of 5 to 15 and you waddled your fat dumb nonsensical weak ass in here and said that's psychology hur dur and have been arguing that for a good portion of the day. I mean think about what your saying and the arrogance with which your saying it. Why would I ask a psychological question about children learning materials faster? What would a psychiatrist add to this conversation? Make it make sense.