Powers & Abilities Roger's fighting style

#42
You literally type it out but choose to reject it because you're desperate for one of the most irrelevant characters in OP to be strong.
The truth is that you're desperate that Lanji is weak and irrelevant and you have to project that on other characters. Shanks and Rogers' are pure swordsmen, Shanks is a master swordsman, what you gonna do about it? :myman:
 
#44
Did he use a named attack?
Anyone who licks their sword after cutting people is 100% a swordsman, Shonen 101.
Roger did but you dont acknowledge him as a swordman either. Anyone who was constantly seen fighting with his sword like Shanks is swordsman (Roger case might be a exception because he has few screentime). And play by your rules, Shonen EoS opponents of the secondary MC are top verse in power. Your logic is full of flaws anyway, it just that you probably want to downgrade Mihawk for Zoro but the reality will hit hard many of you soon.
 
#47
He didn't use a sword style so he's not a swordsman.
His attack was "Divine Departure", not "King of Pirates Sword Style: Divine Departure".

Brook isn't freezing people using swordmanship, he fights with his DF.
Literally all the scabbards (beside the minks iirc) are swordsmen but most of them never mention their style. I guess they are not swordsmen either by your logic.

You keep coming with excuses "this one has df, this one didnt name his attack, this one licked his sword" but you avoid the truth. ALL of them are described as swordsmen. Even Shanks.
 
#48
Literally ALL the scabbards are swordsmen but most of them never mention their style. I guess they are not swordsmen either by your logic.

You keep coming with excuses "this one has df, this one didnt name his attack, this one licked his sword" but you avoid the truth. ALL of them are described as swordsmen. Even Shanks.
This one named his son after his sword...oh wait that doesn't mean anything
 
#50
Literally all the scabbards (beside the minks iirc) are swordsmen but most of them never mention their style. I guess they are not swordsmen either by your logic.

You keep coming with excuses "this one has df, this one didnt name his attack, this one licked his sword" but you avoid the truth. ALL of them are described as swordsmen. Even Shanks.
When did I say the scabbards aren't swordsman, if they practice their swordmanship/ fight with a sword style, they're swordsman.
You're crying because Roger isn't a swordsman, neither is Shanks. Show me a panel in the mange Shanks is referred as a swordsman?

A pirate found treasure and named his son after it, obviously makes him a swordsman.
 
#51
When did I say the scabbards aren't swordsman, if they practice their swordmanship/ fight with a sword style, they're swordsman.
You're crying because Roger isn't a swordsman, neither is Shanks. Show me a panel in the mange Shanks is referred as a swordsman?

A pirate found treasure and named his son after it, obviously makes him a swordsman.
You claimed that if X doesnt mention his style then he is not a swordsman. I didnt argue about Roger i said many times we dont know atm for sure, Shanks on the other hand is going by your "Shonen 101" logic, if someone licks his sword is a swordsman, then someone who we always see fight with his sword and being rival with the WSS is swordsman. What more do you want from Oda to write everytime Shanks appears "hurr hurr i am swordsman" ?
 
#52
You claimed that if X doesnt mention his style then he is not a swordsman. I didnt argue about Roger i said many times we dont know atm for sure, Shanks on the other hand is going by your "Shonen 101" logic, if someone licks his sword is a swordsman, then someone who we always see fight with his sword and being rival with the WSS is swordsman. What more do you want from Oda to write everytime Shanks appears "hurr hurr i am swordsman" ?
If they don't practice their swordmanship/ fight with a sword style, then they aren't swordsman.
The entire topic was about Roger whom we've seen attack without any swords style, nor practice any swordmanship, so he's not a swordsman.

I'm betting Shanks also won't have any sword style since giving up his dominant arm and he'll mirror Roger fighting style. He probably was a swordsman before given that Mihawk kept fighting but not anymore.

Mihawk will have a sword style because he's confirmed in the manga to be a swordsman.

Also betting Shiryu will have a sword style.
 
#54
Roger was never strong enough to claim WSS title. That is Mihawk's greatness.
Those title's are beneath the Pirate King. As Kaido said it, Roger conquered the world with just his Haki.



2 out of the 3 World's Strongest people have already admitted inferiority to the Pirate King. Doesn't really matter anyways because Roger is of a different era than the one Mihawk is from. Roger died before Mihawk became WSS.
 
Last edited:
#55
Rofl what's the excuse for Shanks and Roger not being swordman now, because they don't have a swordstyle, when everytime we see them, they use a fucking sword as their main attack style. And fuck off with the haki shit.
The argument can be said for the like of WB, Big Mom, even Fujitora, since their swords are just a medium to channel their real power. But Roger and Shanks both use swords as their fighting style.
And i'm not even arguing that Mihawk is stronger than Roger and Shanks.
 
#60
How could they be rivals if they weren't close? They aren't anymore tho. :arnoling:
didn't it matter?
In your message, Mihawk is called the strongest swordsman from his fight with Shanks...And being the strongest means you have no room for improvement
Exactly when Shanks has a billion bounty:milaugh:
Because you don't understand the meaning of your message, let me help you. This message is not good for you
 
Top