I never said the claims should be ignored. Of course they need discussing, but I don’t think they were worth trying to read into so early, especially with the way you talked about them as major suspects. Whether you meant it like that, that’s how you came across to me in that mentioned paragraph.
I’m not trying to imply anything apart from my initial statement, which was that I didn’t like that post for reasons already stated. Not sure why you’re getting so defensive and acting like I’m hard accusing you of something.
I wanted to understand how you're trying to claim I'm hyper focused on something by saying it should be discussed. It's a weird reason to claim you dislike a post of mine when you take into the messages you quoted. Mango saying Im active and juliet saying they trust the millers.
You were acting like wanting to discuss something is hyper focused on it when again, it was current relevant information claimed in the thread and should be looked at. Like you're trying to paint me as something in relation to the millers. And shouldn't they be suspected? Its Day 1 that just started basically, no information available expect the miller claims, and at that time not a of posts so everyone is a suspect right now.
I'm just curious as to why the idea of discussing relevant and current information isn't something that should be done, as thats what you're basically implying with that hyper-focused comment and that my post doesn't look good because of it. It's a weird way to try to make a post look bad and I wanted to get why you would think that.
Sure you didn't say we shouldn't discuss, but you're implying that bringing it up that it should be discussed has a negative light to it, which is weird to me.