Status
Not open for further replies.

EkkoLoJinx

"What could have been..."
from town!ratchet PoV, could i not have simply lynched you yesterday then kept zolo and ultra in PoE and lynched them today, while rolecrushing melkor at night.

tell me why dont i do this? @Ratchet
its literally perfect. get rid of a claimed cop and frame 2 other players, one of which already flipped town and has a rly high chance of being mislynched

anyway im bombarding u with too much but i want u to see it from my PoV too. this is simialr to the situation with broker. i made a mistake to move the motion, and maf gladly took my offer to keep ultra alive

atleast i denied them lynching you. you gotta give me that
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
My waifubro is probably finishing the Novel that he was saying he would finish
Ah, I finished that over lunch. It was called "Whose Body?", by Dorothy L Sayers. I wanted to find out if I had correctly deduced the culprit from the first set of clues, which I had.

Might start another one tomorrow.
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
An once again, Ekko, you didn't target him by your own admission! That should be all the proof you need. And if not, what the fuck is your explanation for him getting some result?
This is important, but it's not the death knell to his point. Because Cal could have, potentially, saw he was targeted by an ability, and theorised that Ekko was responsible.

Or it was just two scummy scums distancing.
 
the issue with that is nothing else you claim would be verifiable, except the rolecrush. you also asked for a list of claims before doing so which aided in your claim.

from your position, there is nothing you can fake that would add on to the setup. im the one whose being insulted here by asking cops to investigate me only to leave them unharmed and get myself outed for what??? what shitty mafia play is that

overlooking posts by cal is easy to do. you said you didnt read the game. your gameplan was to start fresh, and it would of worked had cal not post that one hint about his passive that you overlooked.

even if you go back and read cal's posts, without contex you would not be able to tell its a passive hint. when called for it, your best response was to call it a reaction test when it clearly wasent. cal did receive something and he saw it. its a mechanical proof showing inconsistency on your claim
See though I could have even just added it to my claim as is and it would still sound better than what I had. There's no requirement for me to check all the claims in the game.

And frankly, the nature of such an ability gives me the perfect excuse to lie about it to. I could have said "oh, I didn't want to tell anyone, because I wanted scum to target me". That's perfectly valid reasoning. But no, it doesn't exist, sorry to say.

And once again you've dodged the crucial point about the veracity of Cal's claim - you didn't target him. Why are you dodging around this point? Because it lends to an obvious conclusion that is inconvenient to your narrative.
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
I'll take note of your sitting back and throwing popcorn at us approach to this too
I've spent three phases having to defend against a lynch that came about because I asked a new player to claim a tad early. I think I can be excused for being on autopilot here. Frankly, you're not in any position to complain after your approach yesterday either.
 
can you outline to me what benefits does mafia ekko gain from lynching zolo instead of you or ultra during the council?
lets see...
Saves Ratchet his scum buddy?

I thought I could count on your vote to lynch Ratchet and you decided not to.
that was terribad and idk why you would do that.
Pretty sure his crying didn't have an effect on you there...

Either that or you really are town that really did feel sympathy for that display...
Which I think host should had banned Ratchet btw.

Saying I don't wanna play no more is hella dumb and manipulative AF
 
Appeal to Emotion.
says the guy that weeped on the execution table.
just like I said.
You are manipulative AF.
You did this last game too.

You were a goner and these people felt sorry for you.
thats it.
Not because you are pro or whatever.
You know you were dead until you started saying you wont play anymore. sub me out or w/e

@Dragomir why is stuff like that even allowed?
 

EkkoLoJinx

"What could have been..."
See though I could have even just added it to my claim as is and it would still sound better than what I had. There's no requirement for me to check all the claims in the game.

And frankly, the nature of such an ability gives me the perfect excuse to lie about it to. I could have said "oh, I didn't want to tell anyone, because I wanted scum to target me". That's perfectly valid reasoning. But no, it doesn't exist, sorry to say.

And once again you've dodged the crucial point about the veracity of Cal's claim - you didn't target him. Why are you dodging around this point? Because it lends to an obvious conclusion that is inconvenient to your narrative.
added what? the passive? you would be asked to claim what you saw and why didnt you claim it sooner. it will completely ruin your game. checking claims ensured you know whats on the table already for max wiggle room

thats what aries was doing. you have not established a previous postion to be able to look back to. neither has cal. if you randomly claim it without it matching your thread play it will auto lynch you, specially with the info that cal hinted being hidden from town. for all we know you could have been targeted by a town cop from yo tan or a role that got janitord / a player that died.

i havent targeted him. i can read his post and it seems like he is sure he was targeted. you keep denying this but cannot provide any reasoning for what it means otherwise. i told you why it cannot be a reaction test so what other options are left here? cal is just trolling for no reason?
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
says the guy that weeped on the execution table.
just like I said.
You are manipulative AF.
You did this last game too.

You were a goner and these people felt sorry for you.
thats it.
Not because you are pro or whatever.
You know you were dead until you started saying you wont play anymore. sub me out or w/e

@Dragomir why is stuff like that even allowed?
I never once said "sub me out". As for the rest, I mean I've conceded that. Not really sure what else you want me to say on it.
 

EkkoLoJinx

"What could have been..."
im pretty confident in my bus drive and abilities. ive hinted them in thread since early on and consistently used them on my scum/town reads

from my PoV ultra is outed 100%. im not conceding this today
 
I never once said "sub me out". As for the rest, I mean I've conceded that. Not really sure what else you want me to say on it.
It means you keep calling people out over and over for "appeal to emotions" or w/e and you did that.
You told the host directly not to invite you to no more games and that you wont play role madness or w/e.
this is BS.
I would never do that.
you should had taken the L like a man.

anyways.
At that point you knew you were a goner.
ekko saved you,
why would scum save you?
so you can show up next phase saying you scanned "destructive" ability on him?
what if he flips and has no destructive abilities?
do we have vig shoot you at night?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top