Status
Not open for further replies.
Inherently it isn’t

and the definition makes it clear legality doesn’t need to be established

it feels like I’m arguing with kids here
You're the kid bruv, you're literally saying Oda copied Kishimoto over a drawing technique. Thats like saying every new generation of artists and painters stole from the previpus generation of artists and painters. It doesnt make sense, you're whole argument is you not making sense and using semantics
 
You're the kid bruv, you're literally saying Oda copied Kishimoto over a drawing technique. Thats like saying every new generation of artists and painters stole from the previpus generation of artists and painters. It doesnt make sense, you're whole argument is you not making sense and using semantics
If someone literally painted exactly like Picasso did then yes that would be considered stealing his style, even if there’s no laws for that

it’s that simple
 
Why are you guys arguing about invisibility

Even Zoro > Sanji rants are more worthwhile than this :seriously:
:suresure:
Post automatically merged:

If you wanna talk about stealing or taking inspiration then the way they draw invisibility isn’t the way to do it lmao

I’m sure the format of some of Oda’s arcs may be similar or something… wouldn’t you wanna use that instead?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top