I'd say we suspend the judgement for now and see where Oda is going with it.
I myself don't have big expectations, but it's foolish to judge a concept when it hasn't even been fleshed out yet.
I think Oda has had IMU and Pranks in his pocket for a long time, but delayed their introduction.
Garling, on the other hand, could be a more recent addition.
I think Oda has had IMU and Pranks in his pocket for a long time, but delayed their introduction.
Garling, on the other hand, could be a more recent addition.
Even if he wasn't a twin, as soon as we learned Shanks was a Figarland, we should have expected a brother, all the same, as Garling would have had no heir after he lost Shanks, so naturally he had to have another kid.
Even if he wasn't a twin, as soon as we learned Shanks was a Figarland, we should have expected a brother, all the same, as Garling would have had no heir after he lost Shanks, so naturally he had to have another kid.
I can tolerate a bad sibling as it could give some interesting nature versus nurture type stuff but the design being a 1:1 from Shanks down to the beard and voice (according to the anime) just so Oda could do his epic twist... let's say it feels extremely cheap as things are.
But hey mayybe Oda will give an explanation on why Pranks chose to have the same look as his pirate brother, I hope so.
you guys are crying about something not even in the manga. No one in over one thousand one hundred chapters of one piece has anyone ever said anything about Shanks ¨twin¨. It´s entirely headcanon
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.