Role Madness Too Many Doctors (Game Thread)
- Thread starter Guillo
- Start date
- Tags alexis is definitely ai lol just ice for mango luka too cute to be scum
- Status
in one scenario u fail bc of a powerwolf
in the next, bc u dont consider the ppl pushing for certain situations but trying to stay in the background
one is more likely to result in a loss
hell, u have countless games where u lost to a powerwolf and u even powerwolfed ur way to a win in overlord and for some reason u r more ok with going with a situation that allows that rather than one that completely removes it from the equation??
in the next, bc u dont consider the ppl pushing for certain situations but trying to stay in the background
one is more likely to result in a loss
hell, u have countless games where u lost to a powerwolf and u even powerwolfed ur way to a win in overlord and for some reason u r more ok with going with a situation that allows that rather than one that completely removes it from the equation??
Yes.
Kingmaker isn’t part of the game. Ratchet proposed it and a few people have accepted it as de facto.
Problem is there’s not enough research to even come to the conclusion the Kingmaker is real or linked to better health.
I dismissed it as quackery and even if Dr. Crayola is elevated to that post, I’ll vote to close his clinic any time. So no, I don’t also agree that kingmaker is “safe” as someone e said.
Kingmaker isn’t part of the game. Ratchet proposed it and a few people have accepted it as de facto.
Problem is there’s not enough research to even come to the conclusion the Kingmaker is real or linked to better health.
I dismissed it as quackery and even if Dr. Crayola is elevated to that post, I’ll vote to close his clinic any time. So no, I don’t also agree that kingmaker is “safe” as someone e said.
2 reasons
1- He accused me of being outted scum saying I slipped … I called out his bullshit and he disappeared from the thread ever since, Flower saw that as him trying to get LHF (I really am not LHF but whatever) while ratchet thought Mango did an innocent mistake and didn’t think anything of the incident Something I regarded as ratchet giving him a free pass but ratchet denied saying He thinks mango could still be scum but not to the point he would lynch him.
2- Mango‘s post concerning Hayumi … he originally said he strong town read hayumi, then he said he thinks hayumi was a “black sheep” when asked him about the change of heart he said he had “circumstantial evidence“ that made him think hayumi is black sheep this game, I asked him about the evidence and warned him not to lie as I have read every single post up to page 40 by that time, that’s when he completely avoided the question and accused me of being a scum who slipped (he was referring to a post on page 54 which I haven’t even read at the time) but then again I quoted my reference post (was on page 38) and even gave him a chance to answer my original question on hayumi but he dipped.
Bear in mind Between the beginning of the game and up to page 38 where mango claimed he had evidence against hayumi, he only had 3 posts in regards to hayumi,
1st post -> He strong reads hayumi
2nd post -> He fluffly replies to hayumi vote against him
3rd post -> He says he has circumstantial evidence against hayumi and he is probably a black sheep.
What is the circumstantial evidence and why does he push people who question/vote him with outrageous accusations such as “circumstantial evidence against hayumi” and “Outted scum who slipped against me” both wrong btw.
1- He accused me of being outted scum saying I slipped … I called out his bullshit and he disappeared from the thread ever since, Flower saw that as him trying to get LHF (I really am not LHF but whatever) while ratchet thought Mango did an innocent mistake and didn’t think anything of the incident Something I regarded as ratchet giving him a free pass but ratchet denied saying He thinks mango could still be scum but not to the point he would lynch him.
2- Mango‘s post concerning Hayumi … he originally said he strong town read hayumi, then he said he thinks hayumi was a “black sheep” when asked him about the change of heart he said he had “circumstantial evidence“ that made him think hayumi is black sheep this game, I asked him about the evidence and warned him not to lie as I have read every single post up to page 40 by that time, that’s when he completely avoided the question and accused me of being a scum who slipped (he was referring to a post on page 54 which I haven’t even read at the time) but then again I quoted my reference post (was on page 38) and even gave him a chance to answer my original question on hayumi but he dipped.
Bear in mind Between the beginning of the game and up to page 38 where mango claimed he had evidence against hayumi, he only had 3 posts in regards to hayumi,
1st post -> He strong reads hayumi
2nd post -> He fluffly replies to hayumi vote against him
3rd post -> He says he has circumstantial evidence against hayumi and he is probably a black sheep.
What is the circumstantial evidence and why does he push people who question/vote him with outrageous accusations such as “circumstantial evidence against hayumi” and “Outted scum who slipped against me” both wrong btw.
- Status