Not in my list, that was on some video.
[automerge]1729868804[/automerge]
One thing I'll say is that taking Spanish explorers and such isn't valid
Bcs sickness killed hundred more than they did
You also gotta account how powerful were the enemies of the conqueror.
So with that in mind, with speed he did it with, resources and tactics, territory gained i would rank Alexander as first
You might be right about Spanish explorers, thats why I removed one of them and only added one to my list.
Alexander definitely has an argument to be no.1, my point is Timur came from literally nothing meanwhile Alexander started after inherited a kingdom.
Also another comparison would be Alexander tried to conquer India but failed because his men refused go there and mutinied before they could go. Meanwhile Timur conquered India.