[FNZ] Light game Tower of God (Test Game)

Status
Not open for further replies.
But you're not reading another player, you're reading your incidental reaction to something they've done, regardless of what their intent was?
I'm not able to follow on what you're saying here. The way how I'm reading this post it looks like you are saying my read is on something the player has done something a few times before which is a meta read.
 
Vote Ratchet

I don't like naked votes with no reasoning and his post also looked like he discredited my read and scum would do everything at all cost to cast doubts on a players read. I also saw it odd he didn't even engage with me and is not trying to solve me.
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
Vote Ratchet

I don't like naked votes with no reasoning and his post also looked like he discredited my read and scum would do everything at all cost to cast doubts on a players read. I also saw it odd he didn't even engage with me and is not trying to solve me.
I did, you just didn't follow up. You are scum this game, 100%.
 

Rej

Holy Simp
Vote Ratchet

I don't like naked votes with no reasoning and his post also looked like he discredited my read and scum would do everything at all cost to cast doubts on a players read. I also saw it odd he didn't even engage with me and is not trying to solve me.
Isn't that exactly what Gramma did to me?
Ratchet wasn't doing such a play, atleast towards me. Like I genuinely gave a read on Ratchet and Gramma literally did to me what you vote Ratchet for. We are going circles and that's kinda meh. Lmao.
 
Isn't that exactly what Gramma did to me?
Ratchet wasn't doing such a play, atleast towards me. Like I genuinely gave a read on Ratchet and Gramma literally did to me what you vote Ratchet for. We are going circles and that's kinda meh. Lmao.
Which post was it where he discredited you?
 
And you didn't respond at all. So who is it that isn't trying to engage the other, exactly?
I don't respond to posts that wasn't even a question and looking scummy at the same time which was what you did. If you asked a question I would have responded back.
 
I'm not able to follow on what you're saying here. The way how I'm reading this post it looks like you are saying my read is on something the player has done something a few times before which is a meta read.
No it isnt, youre misaligning cause and effect here

Lets say I post something, hunourous or not
Whether you laugh or not shouldnt determine how you read me, it might not have been my intention to make you laugh
 
Isn't that exactly what Gramma did to me?
Ratchet wasn't doing such a play, atleast towards me. Like I genuinely gave a read on Ratchet and Gramma literally did to me what you vote Ratchet for. We are going circles and that's kinda meh. Lmao.
No I didnt, I voted you for a very specific reason, which I gave you up front. You dont like the reason, but thats your problem not mine
 
Vote lynch Rej

leaning into voting Ratchet again for no reason, not down for letting people establish that kind of meta
Its nothing to do with defending ratchet, its more that if Im going to play with you going forward, I cant allow you to establish an NAI thread entrance, that wouldnt be in my interest
For reference, because people repeating baseless nonsense is the scourge of these games
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top