You're trying to apply reason and logic to a conceptual being that symbolises the pinnacle of man. A perfect man, if you will.
Now the idea of perfect is in itself an ambiguous and subjective idea of interpersonal interpretation. While the idea of what makes a man perfect may have certain qualities that all people can universally recognise as integral and inextricable to the very concept of perfection; there are countless more that highly varies based on who you ask and when you ask them.
There are inexhaustible amounts of combinations and variations of traits and qualities that can define the perfect man.
Your concept of perfect may look similar to my concept of the perfect man at a glance, but as you start to adjust your eyes to the smaller details you will find that they are quite dissimilar to one another.
Be aware though , the idea of a perfect being is by it's very definition fundamentally imperfect by its own definition - the perfect man does not exist. The perfect man cannot exist. Were God himself to assume a human avatar and walk among us, despite being the very concept of perfection, will paradoxically be imperfect because he is perfect.
If God walked among us, he would not be revered, he would not be worshipped, he would not be loved, and can never be accepted by us.
Thus, with all that thought experimentation, we can conclude that a perfect man fits no logic, no formula and no restrictions.
Do not try to rationalise the irrational, do not limit the limitless and do not define the undefinable.
If Giga Chad wants to relieve himself of his material body, whether his sheet says he can or not, it matters not to him.
His role sheet is nothing but suggestions and interpretation by the host. They fundamentally serve only as a formality and are incapable of dictating his capabilities.
And that concludes my TED Talk on Giga Chad.
