General & Others What are some similarities you noticed between some one piece characters?

[bluefire12]

Tamago and Doffy
Both have sunglasses,
Wear pink,
Have long legs,
Involved in underworld brokering,
Have paramecia devil fruits
They both have a bird motif
With Doffy being a flamingo and Tamago following the chicken egg stage
Also Tamago went to Fishman a place visited by a Donquixote Family member
Just like when Dressora was ruled by Donquixote family
Doffy also works with Kaido and Tamago crew is allied with Kaido
Heck in both of the arcs they appear in a supernova worked with Luffy to down the villain
Both fought against powerful new world fighters who lost something
Like Doffy fighting against Kyros who lost his leg or Pedro who lost his eye

 

[sanji]

 

[TheAncientCenturion]

"Genius from North Blue" hmmmm.

 

[Kiwipom]

I remember reading about Dressrosa and Alabasta having a lot of parallels especially in terms of character's roles/dfs etc. They're nothing deep but just general like:

Miss Valentines (kilo kilo fruit) and Machvise (ton ton fruit) - both have a df related that allows them to increase their own weight and both characters fight with a similar style

Mr. 1 and Baby 5 - both are capable of changing parts of their bodies into weapons

Mr. 5 and Gladius (Pop Pop fruit) - both can make objects explode either directly or creating bombs

Vivi and Rebecca - both are princesses of the country that goes under disguise and don't want to hurt other people

Also, Ace and Sabo

 

[OEKaneki]

Luffy, Roger, Garp, all self-explanatory.

Law & Whitebeard:

• tacticians first before powerhouses (think before acting)
• look down on reckless fools, can’t help but admire them
• not quite as strong as greatest rival
• greatest rival beat former captain
• enemies with greatest rival, but also friends
• quiet(er) demeanor, not loud
• wanted family in place of one either lost or never had

 

[ZenZu]

Law and Whitebeard makes Sanji and Rayleigh look like a good parallel.

 

[Kurodiamondo]

Tamago and brook
Long skinny leg, use cane sword, ressurection df, gentlemen-like, like to drink tea(?)

 

[Uncle Van]

Pudding and Hancock

-Both were originally repulsed by a SH only to fall in love with them
-Both have a one sided relationship
-Both have a strong persona to hide their vulnerability due to a trauma
-Both are involved with marriage
-Both secretly assisted the one they love behind the backs of the people they worked for
-Both have something about their bodies that they're ashamed of
-Both fell in love with a SH because of something directly tied to their "mark of shame"

 

[TheAncientCenturion]

King and Marco

• Both Zoan Users
• Both can fly
• Both are associated with fire
• Both are the right hands of their respective Captain

 

[OEKaneki]

Law and Whitebeard makes Sanji and Rayleigh look like a good parallel.

Besides that Law and Whitebeard actually have things in common, whereas the Rayleigh/Sanji thing was fanboy bullshit.

 

[TheAncientCenturion]

Ahem. It's "Sanji + Zoro = Rayleigh". Not Sanji = Rayleigh alone.

 

[Zowo]

Jack and Sanji both blonde dudes and L collectors

 

[ZenZu]

Whereas the Rayleigh/Sanji thing was fanboy bullshit.

You're in the same boat to me, you listed the most generic things for similarities, I can find similarities between Nico Robin and Wapol if I forced that hard.

The only thing he has is being one of the leaders of Luffy's generation, you've used that one aspect and somehow bled that into the rest of your points, when in reality Law is nothing like WB.

WB was not a D, Law is.
Whitebeard had conqueror's, Law doesn't far as we know.
Whitebeard would sacrifice his life for his family/crewmates, Law was literally about to kill them to beat Hawkins, and went on a suicide mission against Doflamingo for personal reasonings, planning to leave them out to dry.
Whitebeard secures and protects the weak, Law gets angry at Luffy for feeding the poor in Okobore town.

These character defining things, like being a D, how they treat crewmates, what their outlook on being a pirate is, their goals, etc. matter way more than vague things like being quiet, tacticians (this hardly applies to WB), or admiring Luffy (which is the purpose of Luffy's character, is nothing unique to Law, he hardly admires Luffy compared to most).

I'm sure you're going to come up with a response talking about more irrelevant similarities, and how the differences I mentioned don't really exist. Save yourself the time.

 

[Topi Jerami]

Similarities between One Piss characters: that they sometimes shut their brain completely off during important moments.

 

[sanjikun]

Zoro

Rayleigh - No DF Swordsman with an eye scar
Beckman - Older Brother to his Captain
Shiriew - Speed blitzing fodder with his sword
Katakuri - Same haircut
Marco - His hair is the same color as his pants
King - Zoro likes fried chicken

 

[OEKaneki]

You're in the same boat to me, you listed the most generic things for similarities

Except I’ve listed non generic, character defining traits, as you said, meanwhile, you’ve blatantly lied about Law, such as the following:

Whitebeard would sacrifice his life for his family/crewmates, Law was literally about to kill them to beat Hawkins,

Maybe you need to go back and read this, because the only reason Law was caught in Wano and put in that jail is because he submitted Hawkins after Hawkins told Law that to cut him, he’d have to kill his crew. That was in chapter 945, the next time we saw him was when he was in jail in 950. So that’s a lie. Also strange that you’d assert this nonsense given that the trigger that set this event into motion was when Shinobu accused his crew of being traitors and he told her to stuff it and threatened the alliance (iirc) because of her statement and ran off to find his crew.

Whitebeard secures and protects the weak, Law gets angry at Luffy for feeding the poor in Okobore town.

Oh, look at that, a lie of omission. Law, who grumbled about how pirates shouldn’t do good deeds is also the very same guy that, of his own volition, cleaned the drugs from the children’s bodies at the end of PH. Hell, the very first arc in which we met him, he freed a slave of the CD’s and offered the slave a place on his crew. The guy who “doesn’t secure and protect the weak” sure as hell didn’t have an issue saving a dying Luffy or a dying Jinbe, again, on a whim.

I'm sure you're going to come up with a response talking about more irrelevant similarities, and how the differences I mentioned don't really exist. Save yourself the time.

Don’t sit there and condescend to me about parallels and “irrelevant similarities” when you have to invent bullshit to disprove it. I never said everything has to be one hundred percent similar, only that Law and Whitebeard are similar and pointed those similarities out. Luffy is a clear parallel to Roger, and neither one of them are exactly the same as the other.

 

[ZenZu]

Except I’ve listed non generic, character defining traits, as you said, meanwhile, you’ve blatantly lied about Law, such as the following:

Maybe you need to go back and read this, because the only reason Law was caught in Wano and put in that jail is because he submitted Hawkins after Hawkins told Law that to cut him, he’d have to kill his crew. That was in chapter 945, the next time we saw him was when he was in jail in 950. So that’s a lie. Also strange that you’d assert this nonsense given that the trigger that set this event into motion was when Shinobu accused his crew of being traitors and he told her to stuff it and threatened the alliance (iirc) because of her statement and ran off to find his crew.

Except Hawkins literally let them go because Law was going to kill them to get to him if he didn't accept. Oda clearly let that be known.

No shit no one wants to kill their crewmates as their first option, you want to give him an award for that? The fact that it was even an option shows how vastly different Law is from WB.

Oh, look at that, a lie of omission. Law, who grumbled about how pirates shouldn’t do good deeds is also the very same guy that, of his own volition, cleaned the drugs from the children’s bodies at the end of PH. Hell, the very first arc in which we met him, he freed a slave of the CD’s and offered the slave a place on his crew. The guy who “doesn’t secure and protect the weak” sure as hell didn’t have an issue saving a dying Luffy or a dying Jinbe, again, on a whim.

Lmfao first of all, you didn't say anything to counter that he disagreed with Luffy. He did not like Luffy feeding them, period. There was no omission, stop making stuff up.

Second of all are we talking about the same Law who did nothing to stop the children from suffering and was indifferent to CC experimenting on them as long as he benefited from the situation? Now that's an omission.

Law isn't some saint, not even close to WB in that regard, stop forcing this weird narrative.


As predicted "I'm sure you're going to come up with a response talking about more irrelevant similarities, and how the differences I mentioned don't really exist. Save yourself the time."

 

[Shiroyru]

Rayleigh, Killer, Marco, and Sanji = smart blonde first mates

 

[Lunaria]

They're all drawn by Oda.

 

[sanjikun]

Whitebeard was telling some Samurai to get off his ship, like Law.