Powers & Abilities Which one is more impressive, breaking bones or leaving a scar
- Thread starter traxex123
- Start date
We've seen several times now (big mom, sanji) that broken bones mean almost nothing and can be healed instantly. Scars however have been made significant for the reason that they remain over a long time, causing specific memories of the attack that caused them to remain also. For example Luffy, Shanks, Zoro, Kaido all have scars reminding them of the individual who caused them.
Well those are two different types of attacks so I don't think they're necessarily comparable.
I'll be fair for once and say that In one Piece, a scar is considered something impressive even though it's nothing more than getting into the dermal layer of the body.
If Zoro was given a free shot with his new powerup, he'd scar Linlin and she would give him similar props like she did Law.
I'll say that it's pretty equivalent but I would give the slight edge to bones. But again, two different types of attacks.
I'll be fair for once and say that In one Piece, a scar is considered something impressive even though it's nothing more than getting into the dermal layer of the body.
If Zoro was given a free shot with his new powerup, he'd scar Linlin and she would give him similar props like she did Law.
I'll say that it's pretty equivalent but I would give the slight edge to bones. But again, two different types of attacks.
Nothing implies that at all. Luffy has not shown the same type of AP on Kaido for the time being. He'll clearly show it and surpass it soon but nothing he has done is as effective as Shock Willie.
Law has forgone using his normal skillset to even hurt Linlin. Kaido was visbly pained by injection shot and was white eyed by Gamma knife. It's notably easier to hurt Kaido than it is to hurt Linlin.
Laws Awakening Attacks > What Luffy has shown so far.
Law has forgone using his normal skillset to even hurt Linlin. Kaido was visbly pained by injection shot and was white eyed by Gamma knife. It's notably easier to hurt Kaido than it is to hurt Linlin.
Laws Awakening Attacks > What Luffy has shown so far.
That's what's so impressive about scars though - they don't heal. Broken bones don't have a lasting effect on anyone psychologically. In a fight broken bones are important sure, but no one brings them up afterwards like Shanks referred to his scar from blackbeard. Scars are more impressive because only a select few attacks are chosen to leave scars, so it's easy to tell which attacks are kind of 'legendary' in the story overall, because Oda's telling us. Though in the vacuum of a fight I'd say broken bones are more effective.
they do heal , they leave marks however
unless you think kaido has been bleeding for years. .......
broken bones are more devastating in context of the fight and in the moment . I believe that's what the question is asking.
scars aren't more impressive necessarily due to pain, its more so like almost like a constant reminder.
if you are talking about an attack that brings the opponent closer to losing
it most likely the attack busting their insides. no question.
