I didn't say the Worst Generation is unimportant. I said that, first, it isn't based on strength, and second, it never followed a defined-enough plan through the years for it to work as a reliable argument, starting by the fact that the group of the Supernova that constitute it alongside Blackbeard wasn't even a concept a month before their introductory chapter was released. So if Zoro happened to have a bounty big enough to fulfill the 100 million criteria for him to belong to an improvised group of "super rookies", a criteria that Oda possibly took from Blackbeard's statement in Jaya and how it's a rounded up mark, but Sanji didn't because the author didn't give him a bounty many years before thinking of a "worst generation" to now face the old one, how is that a fair and reliable assessment?
The monster trio dynamic stays strong enough for it to still work in terms of Sanji mocking Zoro over bounties or Zoro being salty at Luffy's comment on his strength. The reason why the dynamic doesn't seem so present post-timeskip is that we had literally no arc with the Arabasta/Enies Lobby structure so we can make a proper measurement with direct 1-1 versus.
And you still haven't addressed why it's the monster trio and not the monster duo nor why Oda has put so much effort during decades on creating both direct and indirect comparisons between Zoro and Sanji and not only between Luffy and Zoro if these characters are meant to be understood as a duo of fighters significantly stronger than the rest. Why chose Oda to create the concept of "monster trio" and put Zoro and Sanji against the main villain's second and third, to the point of giving an explicit ranking with the CP9, if in actuality it's Luffy and Zoro and then such a significant gap?