Questions & Mysteries Why was Shanks

#1
so vary of blackbeard ?
why did he mention the scar blackbeard gave to him ?

wasnt shanks at that time supposed to be commander tier ?
why is he telling whitebeard that he wasnt careless in the fight ?

what will that information do when shanks was quite literally a fodder to his current self ?
shanks hypes up Blackbeard's strength cause bb was able to scar a commander tier character ?

i mean this is like zoro telling luffy to be vary of kaku , cause kaku gave him a hard fight in enies lobby
if current shanks is way superior than his past self , he shouldnt be talking abt blackbeard scarring him
since thats an irrelevant feat against him now
 
S

Sasaki Kojirō

#3
I highly doubt that Oda cares about those old things from 10 years ago that he was writing.
 
#10


prime shanks?
bb avoided Shanks even after getting 2 fruits
Look at bb's face, what harm did even a dying old man do..Then the man who uses Kamusari cannot defeat bb at that time
Kizaru was also a vice admiral 10 to 15 years ago and even had the power of his fruit, so there is no difference between then and when he became an admiral.(aokiji & akainu)
The purpose of this thread is clear and Oda's purpose is not the same as yours
:kayneshrug:
 
#12
Is this thread for the "Shanks was Jack level" retards?
No one with a brain thinks that and no Shanks fan will ever admit that Shanks has less potential than another character so you already know from where this is coming from. :saden:
 
Top