I mean, you're the one insisting that a mechanic that makes only three people lynch able for the Day Phase can be entirely circumvented through a lynch redirect, than scum has access to this lynch redirect and that one of the three must be scum. And you've also gone out of your way to disagree with my belief that we should be ignoring what looks to have led to this situation, despite also admitting that only having three lynch candidates is a bad thing. If the burden of proof lies with anyone at this stage, it's you.
Nope, it wasn't clear at all. Firstly, "free lynch" and "freely lynch" are two completely different things. Free, in this context, refers to a usage of a game mechanic that is usually restricted to one per cycle, so to say something is a free lynch is to imply that it is in addition to the normal lynch. Freely lynch, on the other hand, refers to a lynch without restriction on who can be lynched. You're welcome.
Why should I care about how you feel? To date, all I've seen from you is wild, groundless assertions and conspiracy theories designed to make people not in agreement with you scum, to go out of your way to disagree with them on just about everything even when you agree that the consequence of something is bad and should be avoided (somehow you span me saying not to do something as me proposing we end up doing it), to demand proof when you are the one responsible for providing it, to insert your own narrative as fact and place your feelings on a pedestal. Frankly, if you're town despite all of this, you're a complete liability. And honestly, I don't know whether you are town or not. Hence why my plan aims to mitigate false positives.