Because this "bent beak" thing only serves to show that the RS can make Sanji tank some stronger attacks that otherwise he couldn't. That's really just it. But, for some reason, this is already enough "heresy" to trigger some people.
What? Did Kaido go down? Did he bought even a fraction of second with that attack? Dude, Kaido just appreciated little boy's effort, gave him a pat on his back and said, ok now go from here it is not where you belong.
sorry aesthetics matter and Morgans is a good example and king's bent beak is a pitiful example.. oda got Morgans beak perfectly right but fucked up consistently drawing king's beak? use common sense please
the cause was obviously King trying to pierce sanji in half which even luffy exclaimed to be "pretty bad"
so the force entailing it shouldn't be a joke
In addition! King's DF ancient species don't have bent beaks... having that as aesthetic is nonsensical ... if you still don't agree ben then i doubt we'll talk again
Where is the proof that SANJI is the reason King's beak is bent?
If King later on explicity states "Sanji bent my beak" or in a similar wording I will conede to that fact, but until then I view this as a change in stylization
Observation has been showcased as Zoros weak point and Oda said that observation is sanjis specialty which is obvious based on his feats and fighting style
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.