Status
Not open for further replies.
I'll play along

Show me any post where i actively pushed for any of them.to be lynched
That's literally worse?

:choppawhat:

You're willing to sus and build cases for people, but not even cast a vote out of fearing how you'll appear even if someone doesn't have a wagon on them? Yet despite this, you won't vote for any actual wagon either. Alrightttt.
 
It doesn't matter that you didn't push or vote any of them, you shaded them hard and tried to create doubt surrounding those players. Not only that, you tried to create doubt around the Miller claims.

But why don't you peek at my case on you?

;)
Yes. I openly said i am tunneling them too. And you know why?
Because people are at their weakest when kept on their toes. Push them, make them talk, make them explain stuff, make the flustered. That is when people show their true colors

I've read your post and literally 80% of what you accuse me off is you not understanding jokes or basic principles of shooting someone's feet
 
I thought you whole case was based on "throwing shade", not being defensive?
All i said is I didn't like the way she was playing, she reacted by voting for me and demanding an explanation. And i said if anything some of your posts seem scummy, so I provided some posts I thought we're sus. I have never said she was scum nor have I voted for her.
 
It is D1, literally nothing to go on besides he said she said.

Yea sure sheeping Zara or Mango or Solis is easy to do. I would personally like people to justify their votes
This is just a bad post overall. D1, especially 48 hours, is extremely useful, and this just makes it look like you're trying to justify your shady play this day.

This just makes me think you're waiting to see how votes go before you make one.
 
All i said is I didn't like the way she was playing, she reacted by voting for me and demanding an explanation. And i said if anything some of your posts seem scummy, so I provided some posts I thought we're sus. I have never said she was scum nor have I voted for her.
I didn't say you did either. Why are you giving me twice as much as I'm looking for here. I made a simple statement. No need to give an explanation. Did I say I was voting YOU? No, I said I thought the case was obviously weak imo, implying you're likely not scum unless it's really that obvious.
 
One thing is to dislike, another thing is to actually want them dead

I only have basic sus on Hayumi with no evidence to back it up. Me pushing on her lynch would do what? Lunch someone i only potentially find scummy bcs of one interaction?
That’s literally how the game is played D1, it’s not like anyone has any “evidence”
 
I didn't say you did either. Why are you giving me twice as much as I'm looking for here. I made a simple statement. No need to give an explanation. Did I say I was voting YOU? No, I said I thought the case was obviously weak imo, implying you're likely not scum unless it's really that obvious.
And I'm asking if you think Juliet is over defensive.
 
If everyone did this, the game would never progress just saying. It's weird you don't want your vote to be perceived a certain way, yet will sit here and watch everybody else's vote.

/confused.
I don't think it is that confusing.

Everyone can do what they want. If you wanna vote someone vote them up, if you don't wanna don't.
 
Yes. I openly said i am tunneling them too. And you know why?
Because people are at their weakest when kept on their toes. Push them, make them talk, make them explain stuff, make the flustered. That is when people show their true colors

I've read your post and literally 80% of what you accuse me off is you not understanding jokes or basic principles of shooting someone's feet
How does you admitting to tunneling them supposed to make me feel you're more townie? But you yourself just admitted you weren't pushing anyone. So if you aren't pushing anyone, are you really pressuring anyone? And if you aren't pressuring anyone, what are you even doing writing this as your response? This is a BS response to me.

What the fuck? This is completely untrue. Show me how eighty percent of my case is what you said it was. I don't even suss you for your dumb suicide joke (which I literally made ONE post about). It's the fact that you were worried you were going to be killed and tried to suss Light for it. That along with your obvious worry about how people will look at your voting pattern suggests to me that you are very aware of how you are coming off this game and would like to control how people think of you.

Properly respond to my ISO.
 
How does you admitting to tunneling them supposed to make me feel you're more townie? But you yourself just admitted you weren't pushing anyone. So if you aren't pushing anyone, are you really pressuring anyone? And if you aren't pressuring anyone, what are you even doing writing this as your response? This is a BS response to me.

What the fuck? This is completely untrue. Show me how eighty percent of my case is what you said it was. I don't even suss you for your dumb suicide joke (which I literally made ONE post about). It's the fact that you were worried you were going to be killed and tried to suss Light for it. That along with your obvious worry about how people will look at your voting pattern suggests to me that you are very aware of how you are coming off this game and would like to control how people think of you.

Properly respond to my ISO.
Ask Light if they truly think i meant that

And no, i don't need to respond to your ISO lmao
 
I have been pretty clear i won't vote this phase
My whole case on you is showing examples of how you've been shading multiple players and trying to cause doubt over certain things. You literally just told me that you want to pressure people and get them to react or expose themselves because that's how you catch Wolves. I agree with that, but if you aren't making any pushes (your words) and you aren't going to vote (your words) what the hell are you doing?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top