[FNZ] Role Madness [Season 2] Round 12 - Genshin Impact
- Thread starter Lindltaylor
- Start date
- Tags #larimo #lris #wris jewnicorn lighty cant play because wris playing the top 3 poster except fuji are scum
- Status
a normal reaction to being baited by someone is to either come out and aggressively defend yourself.
or to not care about the accusation.
you started a wagon on ekko based off of nothing but "oh he's sussing me so he must be scum".
then you ended up putting him on ignore because he was "tunnelling you" LMAO.
how do you explain that?
or to not care about the accusation.
you started a wagon on ekko based off of nothing but "oh he's sussing me so he must be scum".
then you ended up putting him on ignore because he was "tunnelling you" LMAO.
how do you explain that?
Anyways good luck finding more scum , “Scum Hunter” Extraordinaire @Dragomir and @Grammaton ,etc
You guys are so good.
You guys are so good.
No I mean you've literally asked for it. You're being what is commonly referred to as an "Agent of Chaos" which means you obstruct civil discourse with the guise that those that claim to be civil are flawed. You could say your willing to be lynched is being faithless or a crafty inside job I would just do as you please at this point.
This vote on Nat came out of nowhere since earlier you said you were leaning scum on Ekko and Fuji and you never mentioned Nat earlier when you said you agreed with the read on Nat. It looked like there was no progression.
Since you said here you followed the vote because if fit your read then why did you not mention Nat earlier on your read?
How am I repeating what Misty said when she was the one who looked like she was repeating on what I was saying. I believe I was the first person who was not convinced on Conq being scum based on what you said and then much later Misty says she is not scum reading Conq. The post you quoted of mine I'm not able to understand on what you are saying since I was questioning Misty on her reads on how it looked weird and saying why it looked weird.
Instead of being defeatist then why not fight? Earlier it looked like you couldn't keep your story straight which was what made me suspicious of you. You asking players to vote you is now reminding me of your scum play.
Since you said here you followed the vote because if fit your read then why did you not mention Nat earlier on your read?
How am I repeating what Misty said when she was the one who looked like she was repeating on what I was saying. I believe I was the first person who was not convinced on Conq being scum based on what you said and then much later Misty says she is not scum reading Conq. The post you quoted of mine I'm not able to understand on what you are saying since I was questioning Misty on her reads on how it looked weird and saying why it looked weird.
If y’all are voting me be my guests 
, if thats what it take for you lot to stopusing meta to analayze me then so be it.
Either you’re scum Drago or this case of yours is just badly made.
@Natalija what do you think is strange about me?
, if thats what it take for you lot to stopusing meta to analayze me then so be it.Either you’re scum Drago or this case of yours is just badly made.
@Natalija what do you think is strange about me?
I wont claim anything, and prepare to be wrong about your vibes then
You saw me in Xlaws game so you should know how i am as town btw.
You saw me in Xlaws game so you should know how i am as town btw.
The @Ekkologix interaction is the biggest thing to me. You both went after each other hard for almost no reason. Then you block him while you still want him lynched. It really is weird you thought someone was Scum who needed to be lynched and then blocked them. Then you went from wanting him gone at any cost to quickly turning around and deciding he probably isn’t Scum. I get you can change your mind but your reason was that he started looking at other people, and he had already done that before you blocked him and demanded his lynch.
It’s also pretty odd that you told @ConquistadoR that he should ignore @Destroya ’s tunnel if he’s Town like you were ignoring Ekko’s and then immediately got into a battle with Ekko to the extent you had to block him.
And now with you saying you’d rather hurt Town by not claiming if you become the lynch than just claim it’s more weird behavior on top of everything. If you get lynched and we still go on To win then you also still win. You would think Town would want to leave Town in the best shape possible even if they mess up here and lynch you.
D
Because if you start bringing up stuff non-mafia-related, it becomes angle-shooting. For example, using someone's online status to say that they're avoiding the thread. Angle-shooting is not allowed.
D1 is not useless in the slightest. It's by far the most useful day phase of them all. It will create a foundation for you to propel yourself with going into N1 and the later day phases. Having a strong day 1 is important. I can't go in-depth without making a big post which I'd like to avoid but just remember that day 1 only sucks if you make it suck. If you doing stuff on D1 and making things happen, you will be rewarded for the rest of the game. Always do shit D1. That's the mentality you need to have to be successful and win games as town.
It's only annoying to the players who let themselves get caught by it. Meta is a perfectly valid scum hunting technique to use in the game. History matters. As a real-life example, investors like to measure the performance history of a mutual fund to determine how well it's gonna do in the future. If the past performance shows that during a bad market year they minimized losses then you can know that in the future, if there's another down year, you won't lose a lot of money in that fund as other competitors would have. If during a booming year, the fund was able to outperform its category and even the market during that year(s), then you know that if there's another boom, your returns are gonna be great. Of course, this isn't perfectly accurate 100% of the time but it's a good way to judge how good a fund is.
The same logic applies to mafia. You use a player's past performance to determine if their current performance is scum or town indicative. It's not 100% accurate and meta should never be the primary reason why someone is one alignment(unless it's so damning and apparent), but there's nothing wrong to using it as a supplementary reason to the rest of your case. If you're unhappy about meta then make sure you don't a meta. Make sure you can play the same way each game no matter what the alignment so players can't use your game history against you.
Are you referring to me here? If so, I never said anything about you fishing.
D1 is not useless in the slightest. It's by far the most useful day phase of them all. It will create a foundation for you to propel yourself with going into N1 and the later day phases. Having a strong day 1 is important. I can't go in-depth without making a big post which I'd like to avoid but just remember that day 1 only sucks if you make it suck. If you doing stuff on D1 and making things happen, you will be rewarded for the rest of the game. Always do shit D1. That's the mentality you need to have to be successful and win games as town.
It's only annoying to the players who let themselves get caught by it. Meta is a perfectly valid scum hunting technique to use in the game. History matters. As a real-life example, investors like to measure the performance history of a mutual fund to determine how well it's gonna do in the future. If the past performance shows that during a bad market year they minimized losses then you can know that in the future, if there's another down year, you won't lose a lot of money in that fund as other competitors would have. If during a booming year, the fund was able to outperform its category and even the market during that year(s), then you know that if there's another boom, your returns are gonna be great. Of course, this isn't perfectly accurate 100% of the time but it's a good way to judge how good a fund is.
The same logic applies to mafia. You use a player's past performance to determine if their current performance is scum or town indicative. It's not 100% accurate and meta should never be the primary reason why someone is one alignment(unless it's so damning and apparent), but there's nothing wrong to using it as a supplementary reason to the rest of your case. If you're unhappy about meta then make sure you don't a meta. Make sure you can play the same way each game no matter what the alignment so players can't use your game history against you.
Are you referring to me here? If so, I never said anything about you fishing.
- Status