Another title for this thread could be:
"Why do other people have fun with a character that I don't like????? I want them to feel bad or like the same stuff that I like, otherwise I get this salty "
show me a panel that sanji can survive a thunder bagua. oh wait.... he can't.....
why wasn't sanji even on the rooftop??? cuz he would get 1 shot LOLLLLL
English is my second language, just as being stupid is your second nature
Yes please put sanji on the rooftop 1 v 1 against Kaido, so he can stall kaido for 15 min
Anyone who’s defeated a Flying Six or is about to defeat a Calamity will have been more relevant than Yamato so far. If you can’t grasp something so simple then that’s your problem.
Anyone who’s defeated a Flying Six or is about to defeat a Calamity will have been more relevant than Yamato so far. If you can’t grasp something so simple then that’s your problem.
I don’t hate Yamato, and I think she’s stronger than Sanji. But someone who has defeated no one this arc is not more relevant than characters who are defeating the Calamities. The thread title is asking for relevancy.
Not exactly.
1) No one else at the time could have stalled kaido. luffy and zoro were out of the battle. Basically yamato is the only one that is capable of the feat 1 v 1. Kaido could have ended the war if yamato didn't intervene. When you think of the importance of a feat, you think of what happens if it fails. If Sanji fails to beat Queen, there are so many YC level tiers that can stall him until zoro gets back to full heal. Zoro can easily defeat queen. And I can even argue that multiple scabbards (denjuro + kawa) can possibly beat him too. On the flip side, notice the difference. If yamato fails to stall Kaido, its game over for the alliance.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.