[FNZ] Role Madness [Season 2] Round 13 - Harry Potter

[Adam 🍎]

whether he is or isn’t is irrelevant to my question - I’m talking about his motive, not yours

You are asking me why i am not on his ass?

 

[Ratchet]

Then give me the highlights

You're free to read the thread yourself. My point is, the game has mostly been focused probably more so than a lot of players anticipated.

 

[Adam 🍎]

Do I? I don't have a read on Grammaton, I see him in no better light than I do anyone else. I see you in slightly worse light, same with Sera, but if you think him agreeing with me on this one point means I'm going to be giving out any favourable treatment... you assume more naivete on my part than I believe is present.

Lets do it like this

If you are 100, where is Grama and where are others so far

 

[Sallucion]

It's mostly a reaction test we use, primarily with Destroya, Aether and myself, to spur activity. I don't like to vote members of TSA Day 1, but that's about it.

Thanks! Atleast I know what we are talking about now if TSA is mentioned.
And you would love to hear input from us about this TSA?

 

[Ratchet]

Lets do it like this

If you are 100, where is Grama and where are others so far

60. Same as where everyone starts with me. You are down to like 50, Sera down to 45, and Jew at 55. Arbitrary numbers, but you get the idea.

 

[Grammaton]

You are asking me why i am not on his ass?

no, I’m asking if you’re concerned that he could be or is doing what you’re accusing me of

 

[Ratchet]

Thanks! Atleast I know what we are talking about now if TSA is mentioned.
And you would love to hear input from us about this TSA?

If you have any you feel is worthwhile sharing, sure.

 

[Seraphoenix]

You're free to read the thread yourself. My point is, the game has mostly been focused probably more so than a lot of players anticipated.

If you're playing contrarian and don't actually have anything, then say so.

 

[Adam 🍎]

60. Same as where everyone starts with me. You are down to like 50, Sera down to 45, and Jew at 55. Arbitrary numbers, but you get the idea.

So a guy you by all accounts agree on almost everything so far is 60?

 

[Adam 🍎]

no, I’m asking if you’re concerned that he could be or is doing what you’re accusing me of

Didnt i say he is sheeping me?

 

[Ratchet]

If you're playing contrarian and don't actually have anything, then say so.

I am not.

So a guy you by all accounts agree on almost everything so far is 60?

Correct. Because none of what we have agreed on so far is something I consider strong enough to indicate alignment from a player like Grammaton.

 

[Grammaton]

Didnt i say he is sheeping me?

yes I can see he’s doing that, what I’m asking is if you are particularly bothered by that situation

 

[Adam 🍎]

Correct. Because none of what we have agreed on so far is something I consider strong enough to indicate alignment from a player like Grammaton.

But you do rank me lower for same thing?
Interesting

 

[Adam 🍎]

yes I can see he’s doing that, what I’m asking is if you are particularly bothered by that situation

I wouldnt say bothered. His time will come once i have my fill with current situation

 

[Ratchet]

But you do rank me lower for same thing?
Interesting

I rank you lower because I felt you were swerving discussion into something I consider not only redundant, but comfortable for scum to thrive within. Which I've already stated a priori.

 

[Adam 🍎]

I rank you lower because I felt you were swerving discussion into something I consider not only redundant, but comfortable for scum to thrive within. Which I've already stated a priori.

So which players you think did just that? Who trived the most.

Which fly flew straight into the trap?

 

[Seraphoenix]

I am not.
.

You are. Most of this thread is fluff. If you feel otherwise, then by all means give me the top 5 things you learnt. If your reply to this doesn't include anything substantial, I'm going to assume that you are indeed just being a contrarian for the sake of it. I asked you for it once and you deflected. Any further deflection says something about you.

 

[Grammaton]

I wouldnt say bothered. His time will come once i have my fill with current situation

But you’re comfortable attributing a scum read to me for sheeping ratchets opinion (even though I demonstrably didn’t)?

 

[Adam 🍎]

But you’re comfortable attributing a scum read to me for sheeping ratchets opinion (even though I demonstrably didn’t)?

Observe the convo between me and ratchet, you might pick it up too

 

[Ratchet]

So which players you think did just that? Who trived the most.

Which fly flew straight into the trap?

It's not a trap, and this is not the point I'm making. I have absolutely no idea if, out of the people who were mostly invested in flavour and mechanical discussions, scum is present within. The reason I say it lets scum thrive is because it allows scum to be as contributive and insightful as they like, because being wrong is mostly without consequence, and being right is unlikely to lead town to either themselves or a scum buddy. And there isn't any way to identify with any degree of certainty that this flavour theorycrafting comes from or if it comes from scum. So if you want a list of players that could be scum through that, then I'm sorry to disappoint.