I thought the case on prof was rather weak
so I dont think the vote change is odd
not the first time I have seen you and fuji cross heads in games
so I will say try not to get too hung up on one person
I dont think fuji's aggression is any different than what I have seen in most of his games. I think his votes on me and others was a solid attempt to get people talking and get better reads which is a bit hard atm.
thats my assessment.
so I dont think the vote change is odd
not the first time I have seen you and fuji cross heads in games
so I will say try not to get too hung up on one person
I dont think fuji's aggression is any different than what I have seen in most of his games. I think his votes on me and others was a solid attempt to get people talking and get better reads which is a bit hard atm.
thats my assessment.
I'm confident that he has chances to manage to convince me and my read is not so strong, D1s are tough portions of the game, it's difficult to come up with something solid on a player.
I woild be on someone else too if it wasn't for the fact there's not enough contribution into the game so far.
The thing is I want Fuji to explain whether or not he was feeling Bleak was more suspicious than Prof when he voted him because that would be quite a turn off.
Reading his posts meticulously he actually later does mention he wanted to pressure Bleak after his first meh response to Prof about him not playing the game with his opinion on his mind. He however also types about Bleak flipping, that post I just quoted, so now I'm not sure how much serious that vote on Bleak was, perhaps he truly wanted to lynch Bleak the moment he voted Bleak.
The thing is though that if he truly eventually switched to Bleak because he realized his original vote on Prof was feeble that's actually not a good look, just like him returning on Prof so fast when Prof did barely anything to justify a return onto him. He was undeniably too flip floppy, so I would like him to explain on that too.
