let’s be real, u know damn while you dnt have any logical explanation for cracker beating Law. It virtually impossible, Laws a significantly more versatile fighter. Cracker has Zero chance.
He doesn’t even have a damn range offense, how the hell he going to fight 1 of the best range fighters in the tier??
Ur reading comprehension extremely poor lol. Hawkins literally never touches law in any of there on screen fights dumbass.... He consistently was being outshined to the point Hawkins need hostages. So where it implied at any point he couldn’t beat him? Or got help in the fight? This isn’t kid with 4 people vs apoo.....
cute explanation tho, cracker doing “far better against g4, been debunked hundreds of times”. I’m not about to even go over that nonsense.
But can I get the explanation on how Queen/or Jack combat DR law? He’s faster then both by a noticeable margin. To the point Doffy/Fuji combined still find it problematic to catch him. Even then unable to keep him restrain. An neither have any Haki hype to imply they stop Laws hax.
How do they combat the massive difference in range? Laws environmental manipulation, shambles, an room slashes. The best range attack between them some damn lasers lls.
He doesn’t even have a damn range offense, how the hell he going to fight 1 of the best range fighters in the tier??
Ur reading comprehension extremely poor lol. Hawkins literally never touches law in any of there on screen fights dumbass.... He consistently was being outshined to the point Hawkins need hostages. So where it implied at any point he couldn’t beat him? Or got help in the fight? This isn’t kid with 4 people vs apoo.....
cute explanation tho, cracker doing “far better against g4, been debunked hundreds of times”. I’m not about to even go over that nonsense.
But can I get the explanation on how Queen/or Jack combat DR law? He’s faster then both by a noticeable margin. To the point Doffy/Fuji combined still find it problematic to catch him. Even then unable to keep him restrain. An neither have any Haki hype to imply they stop Laws hax.
How do they combat the massive difference in range? Laws environmental manipulation, shambles, an room slashes. The best range attack between them some damn lasers lls.
“cute explanation” you zeroed in on what I said about Cracker and ignored everything else... I wonder why that is
Haki? You’re putting Law in these scenarios without acknowledging the gap in haki that could make his abilities almost useless.
That’s the problem with scaling Law because you never know exactly how much haki is required to prevent him from using his hax abilities on you. For example, why didn’t Law cut Doflamingo in half? Why didn’t he shambles him into the ocean? Because it’s not as simple as “well he can just shambles and cut them”
Haki again