[FNZ] Super Role Madness [Season 2] Round 14 - Tower of Druaga

[jinri]

anyway the purpose was to spark activity and discussion, and it worked
no scum does this. drop the bullsht

If by "activity" you mean "confusion."

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

Why is T-Pein just riding with Ekko? Is he his deputy?

yes, are you jealous?

 

[Ratchet]

no u dont have to full claim. u said u have an ability that can confirm urself. u shuda used that
u never implied its a night only ability
and u could of tried to discredit me or call me a liar first, not insta full claim
u know very well how much i tend to lie as either alignment. i find it weird u insta belived me

anyway whats happened happend. it didnt play as i wished it would have. i wuda loved if u waited a bit longer. welp

Ekko, without wanting to pull rank here, I've played this a little longer than you have. When a cop claims a guilty you always full claim if the game permits it, especially when you tag every player in the game to push it. You keep blaming for your own fuck up when it's simply not correct. You've now lied, so you're the lynch today.

When a cop claims, saying "no u" isn't a valid defence. You claim, and then you compare the claims, to see which one checks out. If you read my post, you'd know I suspected you were just lying about it for the sake of it, but the point remains the same. It's time to learn to stop doing this stuff instead of convincing yourself that it was a smart play and that it's the other parties fault for not playing along with you. Why do you think Flowa and Nick voted me? Because they understand that until I claimed I was the lynch today always.

@Flower I'm sending the action in now.

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

If by "activity" you mean "confusion."

we had 2-3 pages in 8 hours
and now 4 pages in 10 minutes

 

[Flower]

I feel like Misty might be good now.

 

[jinri]

yes, are you jealous?

A bit.

[change] [vote lynch T-Pein]

 

[Flower]

Ekko, without wanting to pull rank here, I've played this a little longer than you have. When a cop claims a guilty you always full claim if the game permits it, especially when you tag every player in the game to push it. You keep blaming for your own fuck up when it's simply not correct. You've now lied, so you're the lynch today.

When a cop claims, saying "no u" isn't a valid defence. You claim, and then you compare the claims, to see which one checks out. If you read my post, you'd know I suspected you were just lying about it for the sake of it, but the point remains the same. It's time to learn to stop doing this stuff instead of convincing yourself that it was a smart play and that it's the other parties fault for not playing along with you. Why do you think Flowa and Nick voted me? Because they understand that until I claimed I was the lynch today always.

@Flower I'm sending the action in now.

Okay.

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

When a cop claims a guilty you always full claim if the game permits it, especially when you tag every player in the game to push it

this isnt rly in any rule book. its something u came with
good to know thats how u play
so if u dont full claim u r scum
got it ty ty

 

[Grammaton]

Just an FYI, I require no protection of any sort at any point, the glorious radiance of the Sun provides all the strength I need!

 

[jinri]

we had 2-3 pages in 8 hours
and now 4 pages in 10 minutes

Not an argument.

I'll take a stab at T-Pein since Ekko could, theoretically, be town.

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

do u guys insta full claim when sm1 claims a wrong guilty result on u??

like INSTA full claim?

what?

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

Not an argument.

I'll take a stab at T-Pein since Ekko could, theoretically, be town.

dont u dare lay a finger at tea

 

[Ratchet]

this isnt rly in any rule book. its something u came with
good to know thats how u play
so if u dont full claim u r scum
got it ty ty

I would always full claim regardless of alignment. Because that is how it is played. When a player has mechanical information on another, you respond by giving information of similar worth back, that's the only valid defence in opposition to a cop claim, other than, say, a counter claim.

 

[Nick]

I really like grams character

 

[Ratchet]

Apparently I've been commuted against my will already, so my ability will have to wait. Am seeking confirmation on if I can still talk in the thread.

 

[Nick]

Your scum, no your scum, no wait your scum, no hold on your scum, wait let’s invest this inactive instead lmao

 

[Nick]

Slimey jumping people, never a good thing there

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

Why wouldn’t you invest me. You make no sense holy shit

ur somewhat active, i dont need to
i can discern ur alignment from threadplay or ur actions

 

[Flower]

Slimey jumping people, never a good thing there

That's probably Misty.

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

Oh, he retraced already. Ekko's fake claims are so blatant these days.

do u have anything else to add
it somehow made ratchet full claim, so its not as obv as u say unless u have tmi