Are you attractive to woman with full tattoos all over they body?

Weeman

Weeman

β€Ž
#48
#48
I don't really mind tattoos anywhere except maybe on the face, but even then it would have to be like a full face one.

Honestly if you met a woman who's cool and looks good then i doubt you wouldn't be attracted to her just because of tattoos lol, this seems more of a prejudice kind of thing.
 
Ssg super suit coby

Ssg super suit coby

β€Ž
#52
#52
Wonderful World said:
Believe it or not, some people fully tatted up like this are some of the most incredible people I've had the pleasure of meeting. Even when fully tatted, I've learned it's better to judge a person's character rather than their appearance.
Click to expand...
Stop the cap. We as human beings always judge based on appearances. The sooner we stop lying to ourselves the better the world will be. This is why the statement Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder is true. What you find appealing and attractive I may not find attractive. However in both situations you are still grading her on her looks which means you are still judging it
 
Adam 🍎

Adam 🍎

Pretty Boy
β€Ž
#55
#55
Ssg super suit coby said:
I agree however ir that we're the case more women and men would be taken. I can see your inner beauty and still not be sexually attracted to you. So regardless the purpose would be mute
Click to expand...
ehh i guess what you are looking for. Personally as i grew older i started to appreciate inner stuff more than outer

Outer still maters yes but not as much as inner
 
Ssg super suit coby

Ssg super suit coby

β€Ž
#56
#56
Adam 🍎 said:
ehh i guess what you are looking for. Personally as i grew older i started to appreciate inner stuff more than outer

Outer still maters yes but not as much as inner
Click to expand...

Again while you are correct that's still cap. Both have to be in perfect unity for a man to be sexually move by a woman especially if you are going into a committed relationship with her. If she is pretty but sucks in personality then that's a no. If she is not attractive but has a great personality and is kind it's still a no. Hence why standards in general for both inner and outer attractiveness has to be realistic


Example this woman has the world best personality. Would you in earnest still find her appealing enough for a relationship?
 
Last edited:
Luffy is the mc

Luffy is the mc

β€Ž
#57
#57
Ssg super suit coby said:
Again while you are correct that's still cap. Both have to be in perfect unity for a man to be sexually move by a woman especially if you are going into a committed relationship with her. If she is pretty but sucks in personality then that's a no. If she is not attractive but has a great personality and is kind it's still a no. Hence why standards in general for both inner and outer attractiveness has to be realistic


Example this woman has the world best personality. Would you in earnest still find her appealing enough for a relationship?
Click to expand...
Why you exposing that woman though :suresure:
Nobody is walking with X rays to see inner beauty, what attracts people is a body that they like, you are right about that.
Some people lower their standards when they get too much rejection and that's when they start talkink about inner beauty
 
Cross_Marian

Cross_Marian

β€Ž
#59
#59
Adam 🍎 said:
Inner beauty matters more tho
Click to expand...
I think both matters but inner beauty is more important.
The look of someone is the first thing you see, the character of a person is not written on his face. Beauty and attractiveness is subjective and there’s not right or wrong. Regarding the inner beauty/character there are also some subjective matters but there’s a lot that’s objectively bad. I mean we can all agree that cheating is a bad thing but regarding the look of someone we can discuss a lot.
I think the look is the first step and the inner beauty decides if you want her truly and if there’s a possibility for a relationship. So inner beauty is the most important thing but nobody would date someone who doesn’t look subjectively appealing, except you’re someone who doesn’t care.
 
Adam 🍎

Adam 🍎

Pretty Boy
β€Ž
#60
#60
Ssg super suit coby said:
Again while you are correct that's still cap. Both have to be in perfect unity for a man to be sexually move by a woman especially if you are going into a committed relationship with her. If she is pretty but sucks in personality then that's a no. If she is not attractive but has a great personality and is kind it's still a no. Hence why standards in general for both inner and outer attractiveness has to be realistic


Example this woman has the world best personality. Would you in earnest still find her appealing enough for a relationship?
Click to expand...
Outer beauty decays over time, inner rarely does
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top