Spoiler One Piece Chapter 1037 Spoiler Discussion
- Thread starter Pantheos
- Start date
- Tags #katakuri destroys king #king destroys katakuri #ulti is best girl #wanji bodies your fav #yamato4nakama #zoro bodies your fave apoo best supernova cp0>sword fukurokuju>jack kaido>akainu kaido>mihawk king>marco luffy best mc luffy>kid marco>king raizo>kakashi raizo>naruto yamato > carrot yonko buggy yonkos > admirals
- Status
why would shanks have any reason to davy back fight luffy or vice versa?
why are you ignoring the constant build up that it will in fact be a davy back fight vs blackbeard, because he has a named crew just as big, literally lives on the davy back fight island, and wants the one piece so will need to steal robin at some point
why are you ignoring the constant build up that it will in fact be a davy back fight vs blackbeard, because he has a named crew just as big, literally lives on the davy back fight island, and wants the one piece so will need to steal robin at some point
1. Could care less when you joined the OP community or how much clout you think it brings you
2. The Davvy Backfight did not exist as a concept in Chapter one.
3. If you've read any of my theories on the importance of Shanks, the hat, and how this narrative comes full circle because of it, you'd know how much I know how important Chapter 1 is.
4. This isn't about "other" people's opinions on the matter. It's about my opinion on the matter and yours.
5. Luffy vs Shanks is a conversation I and others have had on APForums for years. Of course the site is customarily down at like it typically is every year.
6. Elbaf theories and Daavy backfight theories are literally just theories that took themselves way too far in this fanbase. Does anyone even know how a Daavy Backfight works? You steal the crew of the opposing team. Or is that not part of the rules anymore? Shanks looks like Eric the Red? His ship like a viking ship? Please tell me more how their designs are oh so similar, because I do not see a resemblance there. Not even saying he can't have Elbaf under his territory, I'm just pointing out that the "theories" behind them are unfounded. Hell, the Laugh Tale gatekeeper theory (which was piled on with these 2) already got debunked because Shanks never went to Laugh Tale nor knew its location as confirmed by Oden's flashback. Could he have the 4th RP? Who knows.
What I'm telling you about Luffy vs Shanks, as a fight, is pure fact by virtue of what Luffy is saying in the manga. Not a theory. He's said it multiple times. YOU are the one acting like Luffy's words in Chapter 1 mean he wants to play some game with Shanks to surpass him. Awfully hypocritical.
7. Stay angry, it's funnier that way
2. The Davvy Backfight did not exist as a concept in Chapter one.
3. If you've read any of my theories on the importance of Shanks, the hat, and how this narrative comes full circle because of it, you'd know how much I know how important Chapter 1 is.
4. This isn't about "other" people's opinions on the matter. It's about my opinion on the matter and yours.
5. Luffy vs Shanks is a conversation I and others have had on APForums for years. Of course the site is customarily down at like it typically is every year.
6. Elbaf theories and Daavy backfight theories are literally just theories that took themselves way too far in this fanbase. Does anyone even know how a Daavy Backfight works? You steal the crew of the opposing team. Or is that not part of the rules anymore? Shanks looks like Eric the Red? His ship like a viking ship? Please tell me more how their designs are oh so similar, because I do not see a resemblance there. Not even saying he can't have Elbaf under his territory, I'm just pointing out that the "theories" behind them are unfounded. Hell, the Laugh Tale gatekeeper theory (which was piled on with these 2) already got debunked because Shanks never went to Laugh Tale nor knew its location as confirmed by Oden's flashback. Could he have the 4th RP? Who knows.
What I'm telling you about Luffy vs Shanks, as a fight, is pure fact by virtue of what Luffy is saying in the manga. Not a theory. He's said it multiple times. YOU are the one acting like Luffy's words in Chapter 1 mean he wants to play some game with Shanks to surpass him. Awfully hypocritical.
7. Stay angry, it's funnier that way
That, along with the Gatekeeper theory, truly boggle my mind at this point.
Like OK, fine, having that theory during Punk Hazard? Whatever. Having that theory after seeing Shanks meeting with the Gorosei or staring at Luffy's bounty poster like he wants legitimately fight Luffy seriously? Completely asinine to me
Like OK, fine, having that theory during Punk Hazard? Whatever. Having that theory after seeing Shanks meeting with the Gorosei or staring at Luffy's bounty poster like he wants legitimately fight Luffy seriously? Completely asinine to me
I'm not implying that but he lacks any feat to say he is stronger than that and even more that much stronger you people pretend he is. So instead of having Law's feat you try to make Doffy YC1 Level.
Killer > Kid. So if Kid is beating Doffy so as Killer.
What Law could do with Cracker? Not even Luffy beat him without Nami help.
Maybe BM's damage was all due Law's internal damage and Kid literally did nothing. But again, this is only working because it is internal damage doesn't mean it is enough to beat someone that can't do that.
Dressrosa Law is doing internal damage but Doflaming is not so that Law was stronger than Doffy? Shit logic.
If he was able to repair than it's enough for him to not being one-shotted.
Luffy got one-shotted by Kaido. How is he going to repair after that?
Your lack of arguments explains yours inability to power scale.
Killer > Kid. So if Kid is beating Doffy so as Killer.
What Law could do with Cracker? Not even Luffy beat him without Nami help.
Maybe BM's damage was all due Law's internal damage and Kid literally did nothing. But again, this is only working because it is internal damage doesn't mean it is enough to beat someone that can't do that.
Dressrosa Law is doing internal damage but Doflaming is not so that Law was stronger than Doffy? Shit logic.
Post automatically merged:
If he was able to repair than it's enough for him to not being one-shotted.
Luffy got one-shotted by Kaido. How is he going to repair after that?
Post automatically merged:
Your lack of arguments explains yours inability to power scale.
You speaking nonsense, internal damage who didn´t work on Doffy doesn´t mean that his current attacks can´t one shot him.
Law legit became far stronger, has learn defensive and offensive power skills, his Countershock who also ignore durability,couldn´t even make Big mom bleed,couldn´t hurt her. And Countershock was the gamechanger for Law together with Gammaknife to kill Doffy.
Yet awakening did a seriously hurt and damage Big mom, who durability is hyped in similar league as Kaido.
And Kaido easily endure GK without much damage, Big mom seriously got hurt by awakening Law...
Current Law>>Dressrosa Law.
His awakening would one shot Doffy if he hit him again...
Law legit became far stronger, has learn defensive and offensive power skills, his Countershock who also ignore durability,couldn´t even make Big mom bleed,couldn´t hurt her. And Countershock was the gamechanger for Law together with Gammaknife to kill Doffy.
Yet awakening did a seriously hurt and damage Big mom, who durability is hyped in similar league as Kaido.
And Kaido easily endure GK without much damage, Big mom seriously got hurt by awakening Law...
Current Law>>Dressrosa Law.
His awakening would one shot Doffy if he hit him again...
King with the fire on his back panicked at Marco's attack.
Both King and Queen have scuff marks on them showing Marco caused damage and he actually held them off when Sanji tried to he's immediately on the floor.
And that was pre exoskeleton Sanji when he was incapable of moving properly and before Ifrit Jambe. Sanji isn’t the same man he was his power has gone through the roof
Doffy isn't YC1 never said he was I don't even have him over Cracker.
Law has feats of beating Hawkins despite the disadvantage he was at, hurt Kaido and is currently battling BM who even with 3 or 4 Sanji's they wouldn't be doing what Kid and Law are doing to her.
Killer is not above Kid that's just dumb. What feat does have to suggest that? Not to mention Kid is captain and Killer is vice captain.
Exactly Luffy who just fresh off beating Doflamingo couldn't beat Cracker 1 on 1 so that's why I say Law is way more powerful than he was in Dressrosa doesn't make sense but each island characters get way stronger. Kid and Law are easily YC1 characters currently which I don't think Sanji is.
Law has feats of beating Hawkins despite the disadvantage he was at, hurt Kaido and is currently battling BM who even with 3 or 4 Sanji's they wouldn't be doing what Kid and Law are doing to her.
Killer is not above Kid that's just dumb. What feat does have to suggest that? Not to mention Kid is captain and Killer is vice captain.
Exactly Luffy who just fresh off beating Doflamingo couldn't beat Cracker 1 on 1 so that's why I say Law is way more powerful than he was in Dressrosa doesn't make sense but each island characters get way stronger. Kid and Law are easily YC1 characters currently which I don't think Sanji is.
- Status